Question
Placido filed a case for judicial partition of a 1,000 square meter parcel of land against Rodrigo on February 14, 2023 contending a co-ownership exists
Placido filed a case for judicial partition of a 1,000 square meter parcel of land against Rodrigo on February 14, 2023 contending a co-ownership exists between them. Rodrigo filed a case of trespassing and squatting against Placido on March 9, 2023 contending that the latter entered the 1,000 square meter lot illegally and constructed a one-story house on a portion of this lot without any right to do so. On April 15, 2023, before the court hearing the criminal case, Placido filed a motion for the suspension of the criminal proceedings on the ground of a prejudicial question. Should the criminal proceedings be suspended due to a prejudicial question? Explain well citing the requisites of a prejudicial question.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started