Plaintiff, a citizen of Hawaii, sued Defendant, a citizen of the state of California, in the U.S. District Court in Hawaii for breach of contract, seeking $77,000 in damages. Defendant answered by denying that a contract was even formed. Plaintiff and Defendant each stipulated that the jury would consist of eight persons. Trial was held, and seven jurors voted in favor of Plaintiff. One juror voted for Defendant. The jurors then deliberated on the amount of damages and rendered a verdict in favor of Plaintiff for $18,500. Defendant appealed the ruling. On which of the following grounds would Defendant be most likely to prevail on appeal? Question 1Select one: a. The ruling was defective because rendered by less than twelve jurors. b. The ruling was defective because based on a no unanimous vote. c. The court did not have subject matter jurisdiction, because the verdict was not in excess of $75,000. d. The court lacked personal jurisdiction