Plaintiff sued Defendant in a State Texas court of general jurisdiction for injuries suffered in an auto accident in Texas. Plaintiff is a citizen of Texas and Defendant is a citizen of New York. Texas is a comparative negligence state. The jury finds Defendant 8 0 % at fault, and Plaintiff is 20 % at fault, and rules that Defendant must pay Plaintiff $16,000 for injuries. Since all of Defendant's assets are in New York, Plaintiff sued Defendant on Texas' judgment in a New York court. New York is a contributory negligence state. Assuming the Texas decision is final, which of the following statements is correct? Question 16Select one: a. Res judicata precludes Plaintiff from suing on the Texas judgment in New York because the two actions involve the same parties and the same occurrence. b. Full faith and credit need not be granted to the Texas judgment. c. The New York court may hold a trial de novo because that jurisdiction does not recognize comparative negligence. d. New York must grant full faith and credit to the U.S. District Court judgment in Texas, If Defendant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate on the merits