Plaintiff was injured in an accident with one of Defendant's trucks. Plaintiff filed his action in federal district court based on diversity for $1,000,000.00. Plaintiff has learned that Defendant's truck driver was fired after the accident because he has been involved in two other accidents. Because the driver was unwilling to submit to an eye or any other exam. plaintiff has moved the court for an order to compel the driver to submit to a number of tests, including an eye test and a neurological test. How should the court rule on the motion? A. Deny the motion, no matter how strong a showing by Plaintiff. B. Grant the motion because on these facts, plaintiff has shown good cause to justify the exams. C. Grant the motion as to the eye exam but delay the neurological exam until after the eye exam. If the eye exam does not show visual impairment, the neurological exam is justified by good cause. D. Deny the motion because the driver is no longer employed by Defendant