Please access Cengage MindTap "Digital Video Library" and click on Ethics, there at the next to last video you will see the video "Don't be a Hero" Policies." Assume that the employees are at-will employees. You can look at Todd's Notes on Legal Research for Westlaw Campus Research information and the Citation Unit for help with citing cases. You could also find the cases suggested below using Google.

Required: Answer the following questions:

1. What are the store's reasons for its policies? Your discussion should include the doctrine of respondeat superior and any other relevant points.

2. Do you think that the two situations (Heather / Blake) are equivalent violations of the "don't be a hero" (sometimes called a non-resistance) policy? Should they result in similar discipline? Remember to discuss the facts of each situation.

3. Suppose that the store terminates both employees. Do they have any legal recourse?

Here are some sources that you should look at. Feel free to find and discuss others.

Bruley v. Village Green Mgmt. Co., 592 F. Supp. 2d 1381, 1385-1386 (M.D. Fla. 2008)

Feliciano v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 559 S.E.2d 713 (W. Va. 2001)

Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc., 913 P.2d 377 (Wash. 1996).

Hoven v. Walgreen Co., 2012 WL 6025790 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2012), aff'd 751 F.3d 778 (6th Cir. 2014).

Ray v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 359 P.3d 614 (Utah 2015).