Please answer #5, #9, and #10. Thanks so much!!
Doug offer? Why or why not? withdraws the offer. Can Doug legally revoke the enen-ay extension, ation device argained-for benefit to isor) possibility promisor will r legal detriment 5. Burt pays $1 in return for a thirty-day option to pur chase real estate from Reynold for $100,000. The next day Reynold tries to revoke the option. Can Reynold revoke? Why or why not? 6. executed contract ween debtor and creditor ettle disputed claim Buyer agreed with seller that buyer would buy 1,500,000 gallons of a particular grade of oil. The agree- ment stated, "Seller may cancel any unshipped portion of this order if for any reason it should discontinue misor is already bound to matter promised urts will not inquire into S. making this rade of oil." Was this a valid agreement? Why or why not? Widgit, a manufacturer of widgits, agreed to supply Midgit all the widgits that Midgit needed in his gidgit business. For several years prior to this agreement, Midgit used between 2,500 and 3,000 Widgit widgits per month. In the sixth month of their agreement, Midgit ordered 10,000 widgits. Widgit said it would not honor the order. Is this a valid agreement? ls Widgit liable to Midgit for breach of contract? Why or why not? Jack, a golf course architect, agrees with Sneed to direct a current construction project for a fixed fee of $5,000 During the course of the project, Jack, without excuse, takes away his plans and refuses to continue; and Sneed promises him an extra fee of $2,000 if Jack will resume work. Is Jack's resumption of work consideration for Sneed's promise of the extra fee? Explain Burgamy made a contract to furnish material and labor for plumbing modifications in Davis's house. A dispute developed over the amount that Davis owed Burgamy Davis drafted a check on which he wrote "Payment of account in full." When Burgamy rece crossed out what Davis had written and wrote in "Paid 7. ilure to pay consideration cited th parties are bound or obody is bound. romise valid if good-faith laim is reasonable in fact and aw 8. alidation device unbargained-for detriment to Auto Center under an oral His employer agreed to sell usiness but later refused to h of contract, Auto Center o consideration for its prom- xp enroll his son in the Little ext school year and paid s former wife had legal Account," and deposited it. Was there an accord and satisfaction? Explain. o 10) Hoffman wanted to acquire a franchise from Red Ow refused to enroll the boy The school promised a refund d to pay it. When Brenner Stores. Red Owl told Hoffman that if he would sell his bakery and buy a certain tract of land, he would be given a franchise. Hoffman did these things but was not given the promised franchise. Hoffman sued, and Red Owl's defense was that there was no consideration to support the contract. Who won? Why? e the school argued that Was there consideration und, legal detriment to support its ition. to refund the tuition? Explain. tional study resources are available at
