Please answer all questions and show all calculations.

5. Evaluation of a proposed change in the firm's collection policy Aa Aa Consider the case of Eden Exports Eden Exports, an importer and exporter of precious metals and jewelry from around the world, sells its objets d'art to stores in six western states and generates annual sales of $6,000,000. In response to increasing concerns regarding the firm's slow collections and elevated bad-debt ratios, Eden's treasurer has suggested that the firm change its current collection policy. Specifically, he proposes that the firm progress beyond its current collection efforts sending late-payment notices and making follow-up telephone calls and hire an outside professional collection agency. It is expected that the collection agency will cost $35,000 and that the firm's sales and inventory requirements will be unaffected by the policy change. To facilitate the evaluation of this proposal, the treasurer has had his assistant, Kaitlin, collect the following information and has asked you to determine whether or not Eden should revise its collection policy: Forecasted Data for Current Credit Data Revised Collection Policy Days sales outstanding (DSO) 95 days Days sales outstanding (DSO) 70 days Bad-debt losses 10% of sales Bad-debt losses 5% of sales Contribution margin 25% Return earned on any freed funds 14% Given this data and assuming that the revised collection policy is implemented, complete the following statements: A. Eden's accounts receivable investment is expected to change b B. The marginal income earned on any freed funds is expected to be: C. The change in the firm's bad-debt losses is forecast to be: D. The expected net benefit associated with the revised policy is Based on these findings, should Eden make the proposed change? Why or why not? O No, because the net benefit of the proposal is equal to or greater than $0 O No, because the net benefit of the proposal is negative. O Yes, because the net benefit of the proposal is equal to or greater than $0 O Yes, because the net benefit of the proposal is negative