please answer all thank you

Brandon is an analyst at a wealth management firm. One of his dients holds a $5,000 portfollo that consists of four stocks. The investment allocation in the portfolio along with the contribution of risk from each stock is given in the following table: Brandon calculated the portfolio's beta as 0.818 and the portfolio's required return as 8.4990%. Brandon thinks it will be a good idea to reallocate the funds in his client's portfolio. He recommends replacing Atterie tne.'s shares with the same amount in adoitional shares of Baque Co. The risk-free rate is 4%, and the market risk premium is 5.50%. According to Brandon's recommendation, assuming that the market is in equilibrium, how much will the portfollo's required return change? (Note: Do not round your intermediate calculations.) 0.9994 percentage points 0.6778 percentage points 1.0776 percentage points 0.8690 percentage points Anolysts' estimates on expected returns from equity investments are based on several factors. These estimations also often include subjective and Juogmental factors, bechuse different anslysts interpret data in ditferent ways. Suppose, bosed on the earnings consensus of stock analysts, Brandon expects a return of 6.13% fram the portfolio with the new weights. Does he think that the required return as compered to expected returns is undervalued, overvalund, of fairly valued? Undervalued Overvalued Faint valued Suppose instead of replecing Atteric Incis stock with Baque Cos stock, Brandon considers replacing Atteric inc:s stock with the equal doflar allocation to shares of Compary X 's stock that has a higher beta than Atteric inc. If everything else remains constant, the portfolio's beta would