please answer all the questionss.,.within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner. else leave it for other tutor otherwise i will give negative ratings and will also report your answer for unprofessionalism. Make sure the answer is 100% correct and IS NOT COPIED FROM ANYWHERE ELSE YOUR ANSWER WILL DOWNVOTED AND REPORTED STRAIGHTAWAY. USE YOUR OWN LANGUAGE WHILST WRITING.

ATTEMPT THE QUESTION ONLY IF YOU ARE 100% CORRECT AND SURE. ELSE LEAVE IT FOR ANOTHER TUTOR. BUT PLEASE DONT PUT WRONG ANSWER ELSE I WILL REPORT.

MAKE SURE THE ANSWER IS WELL EXPLAINED AND DETAILED.

In 2011, an 18 year old was rushing to catch his train, due to arrive in the next 5 minutes. Rather than walk around via stairway, he decided to run and jump across the tracks to reach the opposite side, where is train would arrive. Unfortunately, he didn't see the incoming train, traveling 70 miles per hour. The man was struck and killed, and his body parts flew down the tracks, where they struck people on the platform waiting for their train. One of the injured bystanders sued the man's estate and won. Her lawyer said "If you do something as stupid as this guy did, you have to be responsible for what comes from it," she said. Under Kantianism, did the court reach an ethical conclusion? Explain using both of Kant's two categorical imperatives. This court ruling requires the man's estate (his assets after he died) to pay the medical bills of the injured bystander. Under Utilitarianism, is this ethical? Be sure to explain the pros and cons of the decision. Under Social Contract, what social norms justify penalizing the man who jumped the tracks? Be specific