Question
PLease answer questions asap: 1. Please indicate if the following statement is true or false. The industrial revolution has been critiqued as decoupling the environment
PLease answer questions asap:
1. Please indicate if the following statement is true or false.
The industrial revolution has been critiqued as decoupling the environment from the economy with positive outcomes to both.
True
False
2. Which of the following best describes the impact of the Industrial Revolution?
Please note, there is only one correct answer.
Group of answer choices
a. The answer is not known because population size was not measured prior to the industrial revolution.
b. The increase in production of goods and services and wealth, contributed to the rapid increase in population.
c. The harsh working conditions of the industrial revolution caused a decrease in population size.
d. The movement of populations from rural to urban areas slowed population growth for several decades.
3. Please indicate if the following statement is true or false.
Anthropocentrism is defined as all living things and the natural environment have intrinsic value and should be treated as such.
True
False
4. Please select the incorrect statement.
Rachel Carson in her book Silent Spring suggested that pesticides (DDT) should be renamed "biocides" because...
a. The long-term effects of these chemicals were detrimental to the continuation of life.
b. Pesticides guarantee that only the pests detrimental to human advantage would be eliminated.
c. The damage that pesticides cause is much direr than most people realize.
d. Toxins are not only killing pests they're also killing life in the ecosystem
5. In the famous 1980 wager between biologist Paul Ehrlich and economist Julian Simon a bet was placed on the future price of five metalschromium, copper, nickel, tin, and tungsten. The bet sought to test two competing visions of the futures. Ehrlich thought rising prices would prove that an overpopulated world was headed toward disastrous scarcity and famine given the increasing consumption of limited non-renewal resources. Simon thought falling prices would show that human ingenuity would make resources cheaper and more widely available through markets and technological innovation. Simon won the bet as between 1980 and 1990, despite an increase in population of 800 million, the price of the metals dropped by about 50%. Since the bet, there have been many 10-year periods where Ehrlich would have won i.e. prices have risen.
What two assumptions, from the following, did Ehrlich fail to consider that led to his loss?
Group of answer choices
The five metals were removed from the global production and consumption supply chain.
Substitution of the metals in the production and supply chain when their price became economically untenable.
Rapid technological advancement during the decade in question that led to the more efficient extraction of metals.
Non-renewal resources will never be exhausted by human consumption.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started