Please answer the following questions as you reflect on the above scenario. Be sure to answer each question adequately, thoroughly and concisely, while also aligning with the appropriate NAEYC Code of Conduct's Principles and Ideals.

b) Identify conflicting responsibilities/perspectives.

 

Based on what you know about bullying behavior and the criteria, is this bullying behavior? The correct answer is yes, it meets the criteria. First, it's exclusion because the other children excluded Carl from joining their club. Second, in addition to exclusion, they were going to demean and humiliate him by having him. put dirt on his face. There's the intent and there's also the indication of signs of aggressive behavior. What about power or imbalance? There were three boys to one. That indicates an imbalance of power. Last, is it repeated? Usually, the repetition of bullying behavior is the most difficult to identify because you have to see it over time. In this scenario, there's a very keyword. It says, "Carl keeps persisting." Persistence means ongoing, which would indicate a repeated type of behavior. By the criteria, this would be bullying behavior. Please answer the following questions as you reflect on the above scenario. Be sure to answer each question adequately, thoroughly and concisely, while also aligning with the appropriate NAEYC Code of Conduct's Principles and Ideals. b) Identify conflicting responsibilities/perspectives. c) Look for guidance in the NAEYC Code. Review the values, ideals, and principles, and select at least three principles and three ideals that apply to this scenario. d) Based on your understanding of the Code, and using your best professional judgment, describe what you think is the most ethically defensible course of action.