Please answer the match question.

Match the correct term to each scenario/description The defence available to a hotdog manufacturer, when someone A. Passing off. gets food poisoning after eating hotdogs on the beach that had B. Battery been left out in a beach tent for 6 hours. C. Joint and several liability The legal principal that allows Sara, a customer at a restaurant, to D. Assault sue the restaurant after a waiter spills hot coffee on her. Christina, a local baker, tells potential customers that her E. Inducing breach of contract competition's gluten-free cupcakes are actually made with wheat, F. Unintentional torts unlike her own gluten-free cupcakes. This is not true. G. Fair comment Giuseppe is working at a video game store and suspects Laith of H. Defamation stealing a Minecraft DVD. He approaches Laith, takes him into the 1. False imprisonment office at the back of the store and locks the door while waiting for the police. J. Vicarious liability Selena sells Gyvenchy purses online. They look just like the purses K. Contributory negligence made by Givenchy, the high-end brand, but sell for a fraction of the L. Nuisance price. In a case where there are 2 defendants, the legal principal that allows a plaintiff to recover the full amount of her claim from any defendant who has been found liable, even when liability has been apportioned among the defendants. Josh and Mohammed play hockey on opposite teams. A number of penalties were called during the game and tensions among the players were high. During the game, Josh skates by Mohammed and says "I'm coming for you after the game; you better watch out!" The defence available to a newspaper food critic being sued for defamation because of a negative restaurant review. A local autobody shop convinces the head mechanic at Canadian Tire to quit and come work for them, by promising a signing bonus. Torts involving carelessness rather than deliberate harm