Please assist with these.

Why does independent legal advice usually negate a claim of undue influence? O It removes any possibility there were dire circumstances. O It ensures there was no misrepresentation at any stage of negotiations. O It will ensure that there are no threats of physical violence or coercion. O It ensures the contract is worded properly to ensure there are no ambiguities. O It will prove the weaker party had access to full knowledge and made the decision freely.The parcl evidence rule 0 requires outside written evidence of the intended meaning of a contract term. 0 prohibits the use of outside evidence to define any contract term. 0 prohibits the use of outside evidence to define a contract term when the term itself is clear. 0 allows all evidence if a contract term is in dispute. 0 prohibits the parties fmm testifying about their intended definition of an ambiguous contract term. Dliver wants to make sure his daughter Penelope is taken care of after he is gone. He sets up a trust to provide for all her needs with Ftaymond as the thstee. He then planes most of his money in the mm with Ftaymond. After Oliver dies Raymond refuses to give any of the money to Penelope. Gan she sue to enforce the trust? 0 Yes. because the requirement of privity does not apply to trusts O No. Since she is not an original party to the trust creation, Penelope has no right to enforce it. 0 Maybe. but only it Oliver assigned his contract rights to Penelope before he died 0 No. Sines Oliver is dead, all of his contracts have no effect 0 Yes. Because Flaymond is still alive. anyone can sue to enforce the trust agreement. Which of the following is not an element of negligent misrepresentation? O The speaker was negligent. There was a duty.r at care. The victim suffered damage. The victim unreasonably relied on the statement. The speaker made a false statement. OOOO Which type(s) of misrepresentation allow(s) punitive damages as a remedy? O Innocent or negligent misrepresentation O Negligent misrepresentation O Innocent misrepresentation O Fraudulent misrepresentation O All types of misrepresentationWhich of the following relationshipo leads to a rehuttahle presumption that a contract is based on undue influence? 0 Spouses in an equal relationship contracting with each other 0 Fleligious advisers contracting with parishioners O Siblings contracting with each other 0 Lawyers contracting with each other 0 Parents contracting with their adult children When the parties agree to all terms in a contract but the subject matter of the contract does not actually exist, this is a O shared mistake. O unilateral mistake. O voidable contract. O valid contract. O misrepresentation.Two businesses sign a contract. The contract requires all work to stop at noon, local time. The parties disagree on the meaning of "noon." The court will O apply the most reasonable meaning of the word noon. O apply the literal meaning of the word since there is no ambiguity. O always apply the literal meaning of a simple word like noon. O look at the intent of the parties to define noon. O tell the parties to settle the matter between themselves.Ann buys a sandwich from a butcher. Ann immediately gives the sandwich to Carl. who eats the sandwich and gets food poisoning. Can Carl sue the butcher? 0 Yea. Since Carl was harmed by the sale of the sandwich. the butcher certainly yiciated a duty of care to him. 0 No. Cart is not a partyto the contract to purchase the sandwich and so has no remedy. O No. Cart is not a party to the contract for the purchase of the sandwich and the butcher had no duty of care under tDI't law. 0 Yea. Since Carl was harmed by the sale of the sandwich. he can sue fer breach of contract 0 Maybe. ltitan mayr be able to sue under tort law if the butcher was negligent in the preparation of the sandwich. Mary buys a car from Fred. She pays with a cheque. Fred endorses the cheque over to Jane. Mary discovers the car Fred sold her needs major repairs even though Fred told her the work had been done. Can Jane cash the cheque? O No. Because Jane is connected to Fred, she is considered a party to the fraud and cannot benefit from Fred's wrongdoing. O No. Negotiable instruments cannot be transferred to a third party. O Yes, because a cheque can always be cashed by anyone if it has been signed by the account holder O No. Because Mary has a defense of fraud against Fred, she also can prevent Jane from cashing the cheque. O Yes, because the cheque is endorsed and she is a holder in due courseThe parol evidence rule O requires outside written evidence of the intended meaning of a contract term. O allows all evidence if a contract term is in dispute. O prohibits the use of outside evidence to define any contract term. O prohibits the use of outside evidence to define a contract term when the term itself is clear. O prohibits the parties from testifying about their intended definition of an ambiguous contract term