Question
Please check my answers. Thanks. Ratio Analysis Under Armour (UA) 2014/12/31 2013/12/31 2012/12/31 Peer Group Additional Input NOWC 563,548 459,664 318,661 Net LT assets 477,778
Please check my answers. Thanks.
Ratio Analysis | Under Armour (UA) | |||
2014/12/31 | 2013/12/31 | 2012/12/31 | Peer Group | |
Additional Input | ||||
NOWC | 563,548 | 459,664 | 318,661 | |
Net LT assets | 477,778 | 399,124 | 218,309 | |
Stock price | 67.90 | 43.65 | 24.27 | |
# of Shares (in 000's) | 213,896 | 211,629 | 209,522 | |
EPS | 0.95 | 0.75 | 0.61 | |
Tax Rate | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.37 | |
Liquidity Ratios | ||||
Current Ratio | 3.67 | 2.65 | 3.58 | 3.95 |
Quick Ratio | 2.20 | 1.40 | 2.14 | 2.68 |
Debt Management | ||||
Debt-to-equity | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
Net-debt-to-equity | -0.23 | -0.18 | -0.34 | -0.43 |
Interest coverage | 65.14 | 89.98 | 40.25 | 189.53 |
Asset Management | ||||
A/R turnover | 9.28 | 9.39 | 9.24 | 48.05 |
Inventory turnover | 2.93 | 2.55 | 2.99 | 3.68 |
A/P turnover | 4.39 | 4.00 | 4.18 | 4.51 |
Days' receivables | 39.33 | 38.87 | 39.50 | 39.08 |
Days' inventory | 124.61 | 143.21 | 121.95 | 101.44 |
Days' payables | 83.14 | 91.35 | 87.38 | 100.56 |
Cash conversion cycle | 80.79 | 90.72 | 74.07 | 39.96 |
Net assets turnover | 2.96 | 2.72 | 3.42 | 3.45 |
Net PPE turnover | 10.09 | 10.41 | 10.15 | 7.81 |
Profitability Management | ||||
ROE | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.19 |
Operating ROA (or ROIC) | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.37 |
Gross margin | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.47 |
Profit margin | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.10 |
Market Values | ||||
Tobin's Q | 7.29 | 6.19 | 4.69 | 4.61 |
PE Ratio | 71.47 | 58.20 | 40.11 | 30.03 |
Ratio Analysis | Peers | |||
NKE | COLM | LULU | Average | |
Additional Input | ||||
NOWC | 3,899,000 | 452,096 | 126,652 | |
Net LT assets | 4,144,000 | 450,682 | 298,437 | |
Stock price | 101.41 | 44.21 | 66.24 | |
# of Shares (in 000's) | 857,000 | 69,828 | 141,945 | |
EPS | 3.70 | 1.94 | 1.66 | |
Tax Rate | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.38 | |
Liquidity Ratios | ||||
Current Ratio | 2.52 | 3.39 | 5.95 | 3.95 |
Quick Ratio | 1.53 | 2.26 | 4.24 | 2.68 |
Debt Management | ||||
Debt-to-equity | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
Net-debt-to-equity | -0.37 | -0.33 | -0.61 | -0.43 |
Interest coverage | N/A | 189.53 | N/A | 189.53 |
Asset Management | ||||
A/R turnover | 8.17 | 5.23 | 130.74 | 48.05 |
Inventory turnover | 3.81 | 2.98 | 4.24 | 3.68 |
A/P turnover | 2.69 | 3.07 | 7.77 | 4.51 |
Days' receivables | 44.69 | 69.75 | 2.79 | 39.08 |
Days' inventory | 95.74 | 122.55 | 86.02 | 101.44 |
Days' payables | 135.83 | 118.88 | 46.97 | 100.56 |
Cash conversion cycle | 4.60 | 73.42 | 41.85 | 39.96 |
Net assets turnover | 3.80 | 2.33 | 4.23 | 3.45 |
Net PPE turnover | 10.16 | 7.20 | 6.07 | 7.81 |
Profitability Management | ||||
ROE | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.19 |
Operating ROA (or ROIC) | 0.41 | 0.15 | 0.56 | 0.37 |
Gross margin | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.47 |
Profit margin | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.10 |
Market Values | ||||
Tobin's Q | 4.44 | 1.97 | 7.41 | 4.61 |
PE Ratio | 27.41 | 22.79 | 39.90 | 30.03 |
1. How has Under Armour's asset management efficiency changed over the last three years? Assess the company's asset management performance with respect to its peers (i.e., Nike, Columbia Sportswear, and Lululemon).
a. Inventories: UA's inventory turnover decreased from 2012 to 2013, but rebounded in 2014. However, inventory turnover for all three year from 2012 to 2014 was lower than the peer group average of 3.68. One of the its peers, Lululemon had a high turnover of 4.24 in a recent year. In relation to the inventory turnover, UA's Day's inventory was much longer than its peers, although the Days inventory decreased from 143.21 in 2013 to 124.61 in 2014. The Days inventory of the peer group was 101.44.
b. Receivables: UA's receivables turnover increased from 2012 to 2013, but slowed down in 2014. As of 2014 UA had a much lower receivables turnover ratio of 9.28 than the peer group average of 48.05, while Lululemon's receivables turnover was an incredible 130.74 at one point. However, UA's days receivables for three years from 2012 to 2014 has been very close to the days receivables of the peer group.
c. Days payables: UA's days payables increased from 2012 to 2013 and decreased from 2013 to 2014. Compared to its peers, the days payables has been lower. This indicates that UA settled with its creditors faster than its peers.
d. UA's cash conversion cycle was prolonged sizably from 2012 to 2013, and recovered some ground in 2014. For all three years from 2012 to 2014, the cash conversion cycle was more than twice longer than its peers average. From 2012 to 2014, it took UA 2.5 to 3 months from paying for its inventory to receiving the cash from its sale.
e. Net PPE turnover: UA's net PPE turnover has been consistent at around 10 from 2012 to 2014. This ratio was significantly higher than the peer group average of 7.81. A high fixed-asset turnover ratio indicates more efficient use of fixed assets in generating revenue.
f. Net assets turnover: UA's ratio decreased from 2012 to 2013, but increased from 2013 to 2014. This ratio for the three year from 2012 to 2014 was slightly below the peer group average. This indicates that UA has not been generating a sufficient volume of business given its asset investment. Sales should be increased, some assets should be sold, or a combination of these steps should be taken.
2. Discuss the company's short-term financial risk.
In order to measure UA's ability to pay off short-term obligations we should analyze its liquidity ratios.
a. current ratio: UA's current ratio has been consistently lower than its peer group average from 2012 to 2014. A lower ratio indicates less liquidity, implying a greater reliance on operating cash flow and outside financing to meet short-term obligations. Compared to Lululemon for one recent year, UA's current ratio was 3.67, while Lululemon's was 5.95, which means that Lululemon was much more liquid and had more short-term assets readily available to cover its current liabilities. Therefore, short-term creditors would be more likely to give a loan to Lululemon than to UA.
b. quick ratio: UA fluctuated its quick ratio by decreasing in 2013, but then increasing in 2014. However, UA's ratio is consistently below the peer group average of 2.68 from 2012 to 2014. This means UA's ability to cover its short-term debts was not as strong as Lululemon, one of its competitors. As of 2014 UA had a quick ratio of 2.2 while Lululemon's quick ratio was 4.24, which indicates that UA had a lower liquidity position than Lululemon, and thus had a competitive disadvantage.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started