Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

please do all parts in 25 minutes please urgently... I'll give you up thumb definitely Question II EPA is considering a new control policy on

image text in transcribed

please do all parts in 25 minutes please urgently... I'll give you up thumb definitely

Question II EPA is considering a new control policy on mercury emissions from electric power plants, which are currently the largest remaining source of mercury emissions. In the following questions, let q be the amount of abatement, i.e., the reduction in emissions. The marginal abatement cost function of firm 1 (a coal-fired plant) is given by MC1 = 500 + ql, while the marginal abatement cost curve for firm 2 (a natural gas-fired plant) is given by MC2 2q2. With no regulation, each firm would continue to emit 5,000 units of mercury pollution. EPA's objective is to reduce the total (combined) mercury emissions from the two firms down to 7,500 units. a. If the EPA uses a command-and-control policy to achieve its objective and tells each firm to abate equal amounts, what will be total costs for each plan and their combined total costs? b. If EPA adopts a tax policy, what is the optimal tax rate per unit of emissions? a. c. What are the costs for each firm under the tax? d. Compare the total cost of the two firms in part (a) to that in part (c). Explain how and why costs do or do not differ. Question II EPA is considering a new control policy on mercury emissions from electric power plants, which are currently the largest remaining source of mercury emissions. In the following questions, let q be the amount of abatement, i.e., the reduction in emissions. The marginal abatement cost function of firm 1 (a coal-fired plant) is given by MC1 = 500 + ql, while the marginal abatement cost curve for firm 2 (a natural gas-fired plant) is given by MC2 2q2. With no regulation, each firm would continue to emit 5,000 units of mercury pollution. EPA's objective is to reduce the total (combined) mercury emissions from the two firms down to 7,500 units. a. If the EPA uses a command-and-control policy to achieve its objective and tells each firm to abate equal amounts, what will be total costs for each plan and their combined total costs? b. If EPA adopts a tax policy, what is the optimal tax rate per unit of emissions? a. c. What are the costs for each firm under the tax? d. Compare the total cost of the two firms in part (a) to that in part (c). Explain how and why costs do or do not differ

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

International Financial Management

Authors: Geert Bekaert, Robert J. Hodrick

2nd edition

013299755X, 132162768, 9780132997553, 978-0132162760

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

Why is the CPU the most important component in a computer?

Answered: 1 week ago