Please do not copy paste answers from other question, I need a new insight on this question.

Marvin Company is a subsidiary of Hughes Corp. The controller believes that the yearly allowance for doubtful accounts for Marvin should be 8% of gross accounts receivable. Given the recession and the high interest rate environment, the president, nervous that the parent company might expect the subsidiary to sustain its 10% growth rate, suggests that the controller increase the allowance for doubtful accounts to 9%. The president thinks that the lower net income, which reflects a 6% growth rate, will be a more sustainable rate for Marvin Company.

Instructions:

1. Should the controller be concerned with Marvin Companys growth rate in estimating the allowance? Explain your answer.
2. Does the presidents request pose an ethical dilemma for the controller? Give your reasons.