please dont look at the black part andwer the down one

are inherently dangerous, then the occupier is liable for any damage Choose... Royal Bank of Canada v. Gill they cause. Hercules Management v. Ernst & Young Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company Rylands v. Fletcher For this case, the courts Anns v. Merton, London Borough Council determined that parties are able to Selkirk Petroleum Products Ltd. v. Husky Oil Lid. exclude their liability, even for R. v. Spratt fundamental breach. More v. Bauer Nike Hockey Inc. AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc. Baid v. Aliments Rinag Foods Inc. In this case, the concept is Yin v. Liu "Remoteness" and the legal Chopra v. Eaton (T.) Co. Hadley v. Baxendale principle is: damages are Haig v. Bamford recoverable for loss and damage Donoghue v. Stevenson which arise naturally from the breach in the ordinary course of Choose... this, or which were in the contemplation of the parties at the time they entered into the contract