please fill these if posible

legal environment of business

Case review assignment-this format must be followed; failure to do so will result in a penalty o Description of the case o Case Citation: Appellant: o Appellee: o Plaintiff below: Defendant below: o Appellant attorney firm: Appellant attorney who argued the case (the one who spoke, not all those on the brief): o Appellee attorney firm: o Appellee attorney who argued the case (the one who spoke, not all those on the brief): O Third District Court of Appeal telah Opinion fied December 1, 2021 Not final unti disposition of timely fied motion for teens No 3D20-1724 Lower Tribunal No. 14-17706 Luis Rodriguez Lopez Appellant American Sales and Management Organization, LLC, etc.. Apple An Appeal from a non final order from the Cicut Court for Mars-Dade County, William Thomas, Judge Dorte Law and Matias R. Dort Kula & Associates. PA and Elliot Kula, and William D. Mueller, for appellant Greenberg Traurig, PA, and Joseph Mamoures and day Yagoda. for appelle Before EMAS. LINDSEY and GORDO.. LINDSEY. Appellant Luis Rodriguez Lopez appeals from a noninat order denying his motion for advancement of appellate atome's feest Rodriguez seks advancement of appellate fees in connection with a separate merits appeal stemming from Apple American Sales and Management Organization, LLC's July 2014 lawsuit against Rodriguez as former CEO and manager, for alegedly conspiring to form a competitor In 2017, this Courtseved an opinion holding that the parties Operating Agreement requires American Sales to advance expenses until final disposition. See American Sales & Mamt. O. LLC x Loose 217 5o. 3d 230 (Fia 3d DCA 2017) American Sales advanced expenses until a final judgment was entered below. Following entry of the judgment American Sales appealed and Rodriguez ered. This appeal remains Appelant Luis Rodriguez Lopez apeals from a non-final order denying his motion for advancement of appellate wome's fees! Rodriguez seks advancement of priate foes in connection with a separate merits appeal stemming from Appello American Sales and Management Organization, LLC) July 2014 lawsuit against Rodriguez former CEO and manager for allegedly conspiring to form a competitor In 2017, this Court issued an opinion holding that the parties Operating Agreement requires American Sales to advance expenses until final disposition. See American Sales & Mounts LLC x Lopez 217 S. 34 230 (Fla, 30 DCA 2017). American Sales advanced expenses until a final judgment was entered below. Following entry of the judgment, American Sales appealed and Rodriguez cross appealed. This menis appeat remains pending We have jurisdiction pursuant to Fionde Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130/a3XCW See Local Door Coupons France Ine. Mayers 261 So 3d 726, 729 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) ('An interlocutory order that outright denies a party's claim for advancement of litigation expenses under an Indemnification provision contained in a shareholder's agreement most assuredly determines a party's right to immediate possession of property determines that the party has no such richt. Ergo, review of an order denying entitlement to advancement is warranted under rule 9.1303) In the merits appeal (3020-0563). Rodriguez continues to be in the position of defending against American Sales aim that he breached his duties as an officer and manager. See American Sales, 237 Sc 303 230 (Section 5.15(b) of the parties Operating Agreement requires that American Sales Rodriguez then filed a post-judgment motion in the tra court seeking advancement of foes and costs incurred in the pending mers cal The trial court denied the motion Because this Courts prior opinion interpreting the parties Operating Agreement requires soncement until final disposition, we reverse and romand with instructions to grant Rodriguez advancement of his appellate expenses See Sin:Times Media Go Ins.. Black. 954 A2d 380, 397 (Del Ch. 2008) holding the phrase That disposition in an advancement provisions most plausibly read as mearing the final, non-appealabile conclusion of a proceeding) Reversed and remanded Case review assignment-this format must be followed; failure to do so will result in a penalty o Description of the case o Case Citation: Appellant: o Appellee: o Plaintiff below: Defendant below: o Appellant attorney firm: Appellant attorney who argued the case (the one who spoke, not all those on the brief): o Appellee attorney firm: o Appellee attorney who argued the case (the one who spoke, not all those on the brief): O Third District Court of Appeal telah Opinion fied December 1, 2021 Not final unti disposition of timely fied motion for teens No 3D20-1724 Lower Tribunal No. 14-17706 Luis Rodriguez Lopez Appellant American Sales and Management Organization, LLC, etc.. Apple An Appeal from a non final order from the Cicut Court for Mars-Dade County, William Thomas, Judge Dorte Law and Matias R. Dort Kula & Associates. PA and Elliot Kula, and William D. Mueller, for appellant Greenberg Traurig, PA, and Joseph Mamoures and day Yagoda. for appelle Before EMAS. LINDSEY and GORDO.. LINDSEY. Appellant Luis Rodriguez Lopez appeals from a noninat order denying his motion for advancement of appellate atome's feest Rodriguez seks advancement of appellate fees in connection with a separate merits appeal stemming from Apple American Sales and Management Organization, LLC's July 2014 lawsuit against Rodriguez as former CEO and manager, for alegedly conspiring to form a competitor In 2017, this Courtseved an opinion holding that the parties Operating Agreement requires American Sales to advance expenses until final disposition. See American Sales & Mamt. O. LLC x Loose 217 5o. 3d 230 (Fia 3d DCA 2017) American Sales advanced expenses until a final judgment was entered below. Following entry of the judgment American Sales appealed and Rodriguez ered. This appeal remains Appelant Luis Rodriguez Lopez apeals from a non-final order denying his motion for advancement of appellate wome's fees! Rodriguez seks advancement of priate foes in connection with a separate merits appeal stemming from Appello American Sales and Management Organization, LLC) July 2014 lawsuit against Rodriguez former CEO and manager for allegedly conspiring to form a competitor In 2017, this Court issued an opinion holding that the parties Operating Agreement requires American Sales to advance expenses until final disposition. See American Sales & Mounts LLC x Lopez 217 S. 34 230 (Fla, 30 DCA 2017). American Sales advanced expenses until a final judgment was entered below. Following entry of the judgment, American Sales appealed and Rodriguez cross appealed. This menis appeat remains pending We have jurisdiction pursuant to Fionde Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130/a3XCW See Local Door Coupons France Ine. Mayers 261 So 3d 726, 729 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) ('An interlocutory order that outright denies a party's claim for advancement of litigation expenses under an Indemnification provision contained in a shareholder's agreement most assuredly determines a party's right to immediate possession of property determines that the party has no such richt. Ergo, review of an order denying entitlement to advancement is warranted under rule 9.1303) In the merits appeal (3020-0563). Rodriguez continues to be in the position of defending against American Sales aim that he breached his duties as an officer and manager. See American Sales, 237 Sc 303 230 (Section 5.15(b) of the parties Operating Agreement requires that American Sales Rodriguez then filed a post-judgment motion in the tra court seeking advancement of foes and costs incurred in the pending mers cal The trial court denied the motion Because this Courts prior opinion interpreting the parties Operating Agreement requires soncement until final disposition, we reverse and romand with instructions to grant Rodriguez advancement of his appellate expenses See Sin:Times Media Go Ins.. Black. 954 A2d 380, 397 (Del Ch. 2008) holding the phrase That disposition in an advancement provisions most plausibly read as mearing the final, non-appealabile conclusion of a proceeding) Reversed and remanded