Please help.

Data for problem

Player Team W L ERA SO/IP HR/IP R/IP Verlander, J DET 24 5 2.40 1.00 0.10 0.29 Beckett, J BOS 13 7 2.89 0.91 0.11 0.34 Wilson, C TEX 16 7 2.94 0.92 0.07 0.40 Sabathia, C NYY 19 8 3.00 0.97 0.07 0.37 Haren, D LAA 16 10 3.17 0.81 0.08 0.38 McCarthy, B OAK 9 9 3.32 0.72 0.06 0.43 Santana, E LAA 11 12 3.38 0.78 0.11 0.42 Lester, J BOS 15 9 3.47 0.95 0.10 0.40 Hernandez, F SEA 14 14 3.47 0.95 0.08 0.42 Buehrle, M CWS 13 9 3.59 0.53 0.10 0.45 Pineda, M SEA 9 10 3.74 1.01 0.11 0.44 Colon, B NYY 8 10 4.00 0.82 0.13 0.52 Tomlin, J CLE 12 7 4.25 0.54 0.15 0.48 Pavano, C MIN 9 13 4.30 0.46 0.10 0.55 Danks, J CWS 8 12 4.33 0.79 0.11 0.52 Guthrie, J BAL 9 17 4.33 0.63 0.13 0.54 Lewis, C TEX 14 10 4.40 0.84 0.17 0.51 Scherzer, M DET 15 9 4.43 0.89 0.15 0.52 Davis, W TB 11 10 4.45 0.57 0.13 0.52 Porcello, R DET 14 9 4.75 0.57 0.10 0.57

Be careful-files from the Internet can contain viruses. PROTECTED VIEW Unless you need to edit, it's safer to stay in Protected Enable Editing View. A1 X v fx Player A B C D E F G H 1 Player Team W ERA SO/IP HR/IP R/IP Verlander, J DET 24 5 2.40 1.00 0.10 0.29 3 Beckett, J BOS 13 7 2.89 0.91 0.11 0.34 4 Wilson, C TEX 16 7 2.94 0.92 0.07 0.40 5 Sabathia, C NYY 19 8 3.00 0.97 0.07 0.37 6 Haren, D LAA 16 10 3.17 0.81 0.08 0.38 7 Mccarthy, B OAK 9 9 3.32 0.72 0.06 0.43 8 Santana, E LAA 11 12 3.38 0.78 0.11 0.42 Cap Les the / text to determine the overall significant 9 Lester, J BOS 15 9 3.47 0.95 0.10 0.40 State the full and alternative hypotheses. C Al; Ons ar mare of the parameters is not equal to zero. 10 Hernandez, F SEA 14 14 3.47 0.95 0.08 0.42 Al,: All the parameters are not squ 11 Buehrle, M CWS 13 9 3.59 0.53 0.10 0.45 12 Pineda, M SEA 9 10 3.74 1.01 0.11 0.44 Al,: one or mars at the pa is not equal to zero. 13 Colon, B NYY 8 10 4.00 0.82 0.13 0.52 Calculate the text statute. (Roar 14 Tomlin, J CLE 12 7 4.25 0.54 0.15 0.48 Calculate the p-value. (Round your leeinal places.] 15 Pavano, C MIN 9 13 4.30 0.46 0.10 0.55 what is your conclusion at the 0.05 level of wigglearca? 16 Danks, J CWS 8 12 4.33 0.79 0.11 0.52 O Reject My. There is sufficient suldence to canclade O Do not reject Way There 17 Guthrie, J BAL 9 17 4.33 0.63 0.13 0.54 O Do not reject Wor There in Insufficient O Reject War There is Ina 18 Lewis, C TEX 14 10 4.40 0.84 0.17 0.51 (2) Les the e tact to set a the significance of SO/UP. state the full and afterrative hypotheses. 19 Scherzer, M DET 15 9 4.43 0.89 0.15 0.52 20 Davis, W TB 11 10 4.45 0.57 0.13 0.52 21 Porcello, R DET 14 9 4.75 0.57 0.10 0.57 22 23 ring the value of the tent statistic for 24 25 what is your conclusion at the 0.06 level of significance? 26 O Regect Nor There is insufficient evidence to conclude that SO/IP is a significant factor O Ds rot reject Nor There in cafficient 27 O Da not muject Wo There is Ine O Reject Me. There is sufficient 28 fearca of 12,/1P. create the cul and sitarcat 29 Data Sheet2 | Sheet3 + Ready Average: 4.645833333 Count: 168 Sum: 557.5 + 1009