Please help international trade law gambling case

Question 1 (1 point) Saved In United States - Gambling, the AB held that: The US did not bind itself to open its market for gambling services The US did bind itself to open its market for gambling services, but the US law was not inconsistent with the GATS The US did bind itself to open its market for gambling services and the US law failed to do so The US did bind itself to open its market for gambling services, but the US law gave foreign service providers the same treatment as domestic service providers