Please help me to do some questions in Business Law course.

1. Susan runs a business that requires a lot of chemicals and produces a fair amount of waste. Susan places the waste in a waste dumpster provided by her landlord for disposal. What is her responsibility?

1. She is required to determine what the laws are regarding disposal of the particular chemicals she is using and could face fines, penalties and jail time for failure to look into the issue.
2. She is okay until the EPA requests her to treat her waste otherwise, then she needs to following its guidelines.
3. She has met her responsibility by placing the waste in a provided receptacle.
4. She should dump the chemicals into a river running behind her building to remove it entirely from the building area.

2. The government of Canada sets a limit on the amount of beef that can be imported from the United States. This is

1. a dumpling duty.
2. a quota.
3. an antidumping duty.
4. a tariff.

3. Call Center Corporation, a U.S. firm, owns property in India. The government of India seizes the property for a proper public purpose and pays Call Center just compensation. This is

1. expropriation.
2. dumping.
3. confiscation.
4. defalcation.

4. Quik Collection Agency calls Pat several times a day, and sometimes in the middle of the night, about an overdue bill that Regal Sporting Goods turned over to Quik for collection. This is a violation of

1. the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
2. the Truth-in-Lending Act.
3. the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
4. no federal law.

5. Quackity Quack Companys ad states that its product is the best on the market today. Because of this ad, the Federal Trade Commission is most likely to

1. issue a cease-and-desist order.
2. require counter advertising.
3. take no action because the ad is using puffery.
4. draft a formal complaint.

6. Bad Guys, Inc. is caught intentionally dumping illegal toxins in a river in order to save money. What could happen to Bad Guys, Inc.?

1. Bad Guys, Inc. will have to pay for any damages caused but there are no criminal penalties for businesses making business decisions.
2. Bad Guys, Inc. will win if it can show that society as a whole benefited more from Bad Guys, Inc. dumping the toxins in the river than the toxins caused damage.
3. Bad Guys, Inc. will have to send the individuals responsible to the EPA for training on the laws surrounding hazardous wastes.
4. Bad Guys, Inc. will face civil penalties and the individuals responsible could face criminal charges and possibly jail time.