Please help me with the attached article review. I have attached the instructions as well as the scholarly article to use. The topic is Time Value of Money Analysis.

• Time value of money analysis

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION Volume 12, Number 3, July 2016 doi:10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1153 pp. 1153-1172 PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL WITH DETERIORATING ITEMS, TWO RATES OF PRODUCTION COST AND TAKING ACCOUNT OF TIME VALUE OF MONEY Vincent Choudri (a)Research and Development Centre, Bharathiar University Coimbatore-641 046, Tamilnadu, India (b)R.M.D.Engineering College, Chennai-601 206, Tamilnadu, India Mathiyazhgan Venkatachalam RVS Technical Campus-Coimbatore Coimbatore-641402, Tamilnadu, India Sethuraman Panayappan CSIR Emeritus Scientist in Mathematics Government Arts College, Coimbatore Tamilnadu, India (Communicated by Panos M. Pardalos) Abstract. This paper presents production-inventory model for deteriorating items with constant demand under the effect of inflation and time-value of money. Models are developed without shortages while using two production cost functions. In the first case, production cost is divided into two parts: an initial cost which occurs at the beginning of each cycle and is applied to the entire quantity produced during the cycle and a running cost that is incurred as production progresses and is applied to the initial units produced. In the second case, the production cost is incurred at the beginning of the cycle. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the theoretical results and made the sensitivity analysis of parameters on the optimal solutions. The validation of this model's result was coded in Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 1. Introduction. Traditional inventory models do not take into account the timevalue of money and item during storage are assumed to be non-perishable. However, in reality, most products will deteriorate during storage and there is the time-value of money due to opportunity cost. With this in view, a deteriorating inventory model is developed to take into account the time-value of money. Most researches in inventory do not consider the time-value of money. This is unrealistic since the resource of an enterprise depends very much on when it is used and this is highly by correlated to the return of investment. Therefore, taking into account the time value of money should be critical especially when investment and forecasting are considered. Inventory problems considering deterioration of items and constant demand were first studied by P.M.Ghare and G.F.Schrader(1963)[4].S.Eilon 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 90B05, 90B30; Secondary: 90C46. Key words and phrases. EPQ, deterioration, cycle time, optimality, present money value, demand and production. Corresponding author. 1153 1154 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN and R.V.Mallaya(1966)[3] extended the model to consider price-dependent demand. The concept of the time-value of money and inflation are commonly applied to investment and forecasting where time is an important factor. J.A.Buzacott(1979)[1] is perhaps the first author to include the concept of inflation in inventory modeling. He developed a minimum cost model for a single item inventory with inflation. According to the study of H.M. Wee(1993)[13], deteriorating items refers to the items that become decayed, damaged, evaporative, expires, invalid, devaluation and so on through time. According to the definition, deteriorating items can be classified into two categories. The first category refers to the items that become decayed, damaged, evaporative, or expires through time, like meat, vegetables, fruit, medicine, flowers film and so on; the other category refers to the items that lose part or total value through time because of new technology or the introduction of alternatives, like computer chips, mobile phones, fashion and seasonal goods and so on. Both categories have the characteristic of short life cycle. In the first category, the items have a short natural life cycle. After a specific period (such as durability), the natural attributes of the items change and then lose useable value and economic value; In the second category, the items have short market life cycle. After a period of popularity in the market, the items loss the original economic value due to the changes in consumer preference, product upgrading and other reasons. Wee et al.(1999)[14] applied the discounted cash-flow approach to the deterministic inventory model for an item that deteriorates over time at a varying rate and derived optimal production and pricing policies to maximize the net present value of profits over a finite planning horizon. I Moon and S Lee(2000)[6] considered extensions to the EOQ model particularly recognition of the time-value of money and inflation and developed simulation model that can be used for any distribution case, setting out the associated algorithm. N. H. Shah(2006)[10] derived an inventory model by assuming constant rate of deterioration of units in an inventory, time value of money under the conditions of permissible delay in payments. The optimal replenishments and fraction of cycle time are decision variables to minimize the present value of inventory cost over a finite planning horizon. Chung and Chang (2007)[2] developed a deterministic inventory model incorporating a temporary price discount, deteriorating items and time-value of money. S.R.Singh(2009)[11] proposed to derive a deterministic inventory model for a stock with time-varying deterioration rate with a linear trend in demand over a finite planning horizon in the study and assumed that the supplier offers credit limit to the retailers during which there is no interest charged. Widyadana et al. (2010) extended I Moon and S Lee's model (2000)[6] to examine a production system with a random life cycle, two conditions are discussed: the first is when the product life cycle ends in the production stage and the second is when the product life cycle ends in the non-production stage and developed an algorithm to derive the optimal period time and expected total cost. Barzoki et al. (2011)[7] presented the effect of inflation and time value of money on the EPQ model with rework and the total cost relation involves a exponential function. S. Singh et al. (2011)[12] developed an inventory model for decaying items with selling price dependent demand in which inflationary environment and deterioration rate is taken as two parameter Weibull distribution. Sarkar and Moon (2011)[9] considered a production inventory model for stochastic demand, with the effect of inflation and profit function is derived by using both general distribution of demand and the uniform rectangular distribution demand. A. Roy and G. P. Samanta(2011)[8] reflected the real life problem by allowing unit selling price and purchasing price to be PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL 1155 unequal and continuous production control inventory model for deteriorating items in which two different rates of production are available. Lia et al. (2012) developed an inventory model for exponential deteriorating items under conditions of permissible delay in payments. The objective is to determine the optimal replenishment policies, in order to maximize the systems average profit per unit of time. Factors such as demand, deteriorating rate and so on should be taken into consideration in the deteriorating inventory study. Other factors like price discount, allow shortage or not, inflation and the time-value of money are also important in the study of deteriorating items inventory. By making different combinations of these factors stated above, we can get different inventory models. Time value of money was one of the first special concepts considered as the basic EOQ model. The effect of time value of money is very important and it should reflect the development of inventory models. Since, money tied up in inventories can change its actual value over time; the effect of inflation rate can affect the optimal policies. In this paper, models were developed for an infinite planning horizon which considering time value of money. Closed formulas are obtained in models, where shortage is not allowed for the optimal policies and the corresponding cost. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is concerned with assumptions and notations, Section 3 presents the mathematical model for finding the optimal solutions and numerical example. Finally, the paper summary and conclusion in section 4. 2. Assumptions and notations. 2.1. Assumptions. The following assumptions are used to formulate the problem. 1. Initial inventory level is zero and planning horizon is infinite. 2. The demand rate is known to be constant and continuous. 3. Shortages are not allowed. 4. Holding cost per unit per year is known. 5. The lead time is known and constant. 6. Items are produced/ purchased and added to the inventory. 7. The item is a single product; it does not interact with any other inventory items. 8. The production rate is always greater than or equal to the sum of the demand rate. 9. The deteriorating items exist in lot size Q. 2.2. Notations. 1. P - Production rate in units per unit time 2. D - Demand rate in units per unit time 3. Q-Optimal size of production run 4. Cp - Production cost per unit 5. - Rate of deteriorative. 6. C1 - Production cost incurred at beginning of each cycle and C2 - production cost incurred at production process takes place. 7. Ch -Holding cost per unit/year 8. C0 - Setup cost / ordering cost 9. T - Cycle time 10. T1 - The time during which the stock is building up at a constant rate of P D units per unit time that is Production time. 11. R - Rate of interest 1156 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN 3. Mathematical model. The objective of the inventory models is to determine the optimal cycle time or the corresponding optimal production quantity in order to minimize the total relevant cost. Consequently, the production time and the maximum inventory level can easily be calculated. Figure 1 represents the EPQ model with constant demand. The inventory on-hand increases with the rate P D, which is the production rate minus consumption rate, until time T1 when the production process stops and the inventory on hand reaches its maximum level Q1 . After that point, the inventory level decreases with the consumption rate D, until it becomes zero at the end of the cycle T , when the production process is resumed again. Figure 1. Production Inventory Cycle During the production stage, the inventory of good items increases due to production but decreases due to demand and deterioration items. Thus, the inventory differential equation is dI(t) + I(t) = P D ; 0 t T1 dt (1) The inventory differential equation during the consumption period with no production and subsequently reduction in the inventory level due to deterioration items is given by dI(t) + I(t) = D ; T1 t T (2) dt With the boundary conditions: I(0) = 0, I(T1 ) = Q1 , I(T ) = 0 During the first cycle, the inventory level I(t), at time t is equal to From (1), I(t) = \u0003 P D \u0002 1 et ; 0 t T1 (3) From (1), i Dh 1 e(T t) 1 ; T1 t T We know that, I1 (T1 ) = I2 (T1 ) from the equations (3) and (4) , i Dh i P D h I(t) = 1 eT1 ) = e(T T1 ) 1 I(t) = (4) (5) PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL 1157 In order to facilitate analysis, we do an asymptotic analysis for I1 (t). Expanding the exponential functions and neglecting second and higher power of for small value of . Therefore, \u0014 \u0015 \u0014 \u0015 1 1 2 (P D) T1 T12 = D (T T1 ) + (T T1 ) 2 2 From Yong He and Ju He [10], T1 was considered as follows, \u0014 \u0015 \u0014 \u0015 1 1 (P D) T1 T12 = D(T T1 ) 1 + (T T1 ) 2 2 From Misra [11] , T1 was considered as follows, T1 = \u0014 \u0015 1 D (T T1 ) 1 + (T T1 ) P D 2 But in this model, we have considered T1 as follows, (P D)T1 = D(T T1 ), Therefore, T1 = D T P The maximum inventory is as follows: I(T1 ) = Q1 \u0001 P D 1 eT1 = Q1 Therefore, Q1 = (P D)T1 (6) 3.1. Model - 1 Production inventory model with deteriorating items. The total cost comprise of the sum of the production cost, ordering cost, holding cost, deteriorating cost. They are grouped together after evaluating the above cost individually. (i) Production Cost /unit time = P (t)CP (ii) Ordering Cost / unit time = TP = DCP T C0 D = C0 T Q (7) (8) (iii) Holding Cost / unit time : Holding cost is applicable to both stages of the production cycle, as described by 1158 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN T Z1 ZT Ch I(t)dt + I(t)dt HC = T 0 T1 T Z1 ZT \u0010 \u0011 \u0001 Ch P D D = e(T t) 1 dt 1 et dt + T 0 T1 \u0014 \u0010 \u0011T \u0015 \u0001 Ch P D D T 1 (T t) t = 2 e + t t + e 0 T 2 T1 \u0014 \u0010 \u0011\u0015 \u0001 D Ch P D (T t) T1 = + (T T1 ) TP + e 1 2 1e T 2 " ( )# \u001a \u001b 2 Ch P D 2 T12 D 2 (T T1 ) = + 2 2 T 2 2 " # 2 Ch (P D)T12 D(T T1 ) = + T 2 2 \u0014 \u0015 2 Ch P T1 = + DT 2DT1 T T T Ch D(P D) from equation (5) = 2P (9) (iv) Deteriorating Cost/unit time: Deteriorating cost, which is applicable to both stages of the production cycle. Therefore, T Z1 ZT Cd DC = I1 (t)dt + I2 (t)dt T 0 T1 T Z1 ZT \u0010 \u0011 \u0001 Cd P D D (T t) = 1 et dt + e 1 dt T 0 T1 Expanding the exponential functions and neglecting second and higher power of for small value of . DC = T DCd (P D) 2P (10) Therefore, Total Cost (T C) = PurchaseCost + OrderingCost + HoldingCost + DeterioratingCost + PriceDiscount = DCP + C0 T Ch D(P D) T DCd (P D) + + T 2P 2P (11) PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL 1159 Differentiating the Total Cost w.r.t. T, (Ch + Cd )D(P D) 2C0 C0 2 + = 3 >0 (T C) = = 0 and 2 2 T T s 2P T T s 2P C0 2DP C0 Therefore, T = and Q = D(P D)(Ch + Cd ) (P D)(Ch + Cd ) (12) Numerical example. Let us consider the cost parameters P = 5000 units, D = 4500 units, Ch = 10, Cp = 100,C0 = 100,=0.01 to0.10,Cd = 100. Optimum solution. Optimum Quantity Q = 904.53; Tp = 0.1809, T = 0.2010 , Production cost = 450,000 , Setup cost = 497.49 , Holding cost = 452.27 , Deteriorating cost = 45.22 , Price Discount = 2250 and Total cost = 453244.99 Table 1. Variation of Rate of Deteriorating Items with inventory and total Cost. Q T T1 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 904.53 866.02 832.05 801.78 774.60 750.00 727.61 0.201 0.1924 0.1849 0.1782 0.1721 0.1667 0.1617 0.1809 0.1732 0.1664 0.1604 0.1549 0.1500 0.1455 0.08 707.11 0.09 688.25 0.10 670.82 0.1571 0.1529 0.1491 Setup Cost 497.49 519.61 540.83 561.25 580.95 600.00 618.47 Holding Deteriorative Cost Cost 452.27 45.22 433.01 86.60 416.02 124.81 400.89 160.36 387.30 193.65 375.00 225.00 363.80 254.66 0.1414 636.4 0.1376 653.84 0.1342 670.82 353.55 344.12 335.41 282.84 309.71 335.41 Total Cost 450994.99 451039.23 451081.66 451122.5 451161.89 451200.00 451236.93 451272.79 451307.67 451341.64 Note : Production cost constant=450,000 From the table 1, a study in the rate of deteriorative items with optimum quantity, cycle time, production time (T1 ) , set up cost, holding cost, deteriorating cost and total cost is observed. It is also seen that when the rate of deteriorative items increase then set up cost, deteriorative cost increases, as there is positive relationship between them and optimum quantity, cycle time, production time, holding cost decreases, there is negative relationship between them. Sensitivity analysis. The total cost functions are the real solution in which the model parameters are assumed to be static values. It is reasonable to study the sensitivity i.e. the effect of making changes in the model parameters over a given optimum solution. It is important to find the effects on different system performance measures, such as cost function, inventory system, etc. For this purpose, sensitivity analysis of various system parameters for models of this research are required to be observed whether the current solutions remain unchanged or infeasible. 1160 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN Table 2. Effect of Demand and cost parameters on optimal values Parameters C0 Ch Cp 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 80 90 100 110 120 8 9 10 11 12 80 90 100 110 120 Q 904.53 866.02 832.05 801.78 774.6 809.04 858.12 904.53 948.68 990.87 1000.00 948.68 904.53 866.02 832.05 912.87 908.67 904.53 900.45 896.42 Optimum values T1 T Total Cost 0.1809 0.201 450994.99 0.1732 0.1925 451039.23 0.1664 0.1849 451081.66 0.1604 0.1782 451122.5 0.1549 0.1721 451161.89 0.1618 0.1798 450889.94 0.1716 0.1907 450943.93 0.1809 0.201 450994.99 0.1897 0.2108 451043.55 0.1981 0.2202 451089.95 0.2000 0.2222 450900.00 0.1897 0.2108 450948.68 0.1809 0.201 450994.99 0.1732 0.1925 451039.23 0.1664 0.1849 451081.66 0.1826 0.2029 360985.9 0.1817 0.2019 405990.45 0.1809 0.201 450994.99 0.1801 0.2001 495999.5 0.1793 0.1992 541003.99 Observations. 1. With the increase in rate of deteriorating items, optimum quantity (Q), production time (T1 ) , cycle time (T ) decreases but total cost increases. 2. With the increase in setup cost per unit (C0 ) , optimum quantity (Q), Production time (T1 ) , cycle time (T ) and total cost increases. 3. With the increase in holding cost per unit (Ch ), optimum quantity (Q), production time (T1 ) and cycle time (T ) decreases but total cost increases. 4. With the increase in production cost, optimum quantity, cycle time and production time decreases but total cost increases. Special case. If the production system is considered to be ideal that is no deterioration is produced, it means the value of is set to zero. In that case, equations (11) and (12) reduce to the classical economic production quantity model as follows TotalCost(TC) = PurchaseCost + OrderingCost + HoldingCost + ShortageCost C0 Ch P (P D)T12 CS (P D) = DCP + + + (DT P T1 ) 2 T 2T D 2T P D s s 2P C0 (Ch + CS ) 2P DCo (Ch + CS ) T = , Therefore Q = (P D)DCh CS (P D)Ch CS 3.2. Model - 2 Production inventory model with present value money. Case(i). Usually, in the analysis of an inventory system, normally three types of costs are considered. These are production cost, inventory carrying cost and PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL 1161 holding cost. But purchasing cost is constant. This is not so if we considered the value of money, hence this cost will be included in the analysis. In the first case, the production cost Cp , has two components. The cost C1 , that is incurred at the beginning of each cycle and is applied to the total quantity produced during the cycle and a second cost C2 which is incurred as the production process takes place. To incorporate the effect of time-value of money into the equations, the difference between the interest rate and inflation rate is calculated as r, the inflation free or real interest rate representing the time value of money. That is, r = R f . (i) OrderingCost = C0 (13) ZT1 (ii) ProductionCost = QC1 + C2 P erT dt 0 \u0011 rDT P C2 \u0010 1e P where CP = C1 + C2 = DT C1 + r (iii) Holding Cost : Holding cost is applicable to both stages of the (14) production cycle,as described by T Z1 ZT HC = Ch I(t)ert dt + I(t)ert dt 0 T1 T ZT Z1 \u0010 \u0011 \u0001 D P D 1 et ert dt + e(T t) 1 ert dt = Ch 0 T1 T Z1 ZT \u0010 \u0010 \u0011 \u0011 P D D = Ch ert e(r+)t dt + eT (r+t)t ert dt 0 " P D = Ch Ch = r(r + ) \u0014 Ch = r(r + ) T1 \u001bT 1 \u001a \u001bT # e(r+)t ert D ert eT (r+)t + r+ r r r+ 0 T1 \b (r+)T rT1 1 (P \u001aD) re (r + )e +\u001b (r + )erT rerT +D rT1 T (r+)T1 (r + )e + re \b (r+)T \u0001 \u0015 rT 1 Pr e \u0001 e 1 + P 1\u0001 erT1 D 1 erT + Dr eT 1 e(r+)T1 \u001a Substitute the value of and simplify. \u0010 (r+)DT \u0011 \u0010 \u0011 rDT rDT P P P Pr e e + P 1 e Ch HC = \u0001 \u0001 (r+)DT r(r + ) P D 1 erT + Dr eT 1 e (15) 1162 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN (iv) Deteriorating Cost/unit time: Deteriorating cost, which is applicable to both stages of the production cycle. Therefore, T Z1 ZT DC = Cd I1 (t)ert dt + I2 (t)ert dt 0 Cd = r(r + ) T1 " \u0010 \u0011 \u0010 \u0011 # rDT rDT + P 1 e P e P \u0001 \u0001 (r+)DT P D 1 erT + Dr eT 1 e Pr e (r+)DT P (16) Total Cost TC (T) = Purchase Cost + Ordering Cost + Holding Cost + Deteriorating Cost. Assuming continuous compounding and a constant setup cost C0 , the present value of the total cost of the inventory system for the first cycle, TC (T ), can be expressed as, \u0011 rDt P C2 \u0010 T C(T ) = C0 + QC1 + 1e P r \u0010 \u0011 \u0010 \u0011 # " (r+)DT rDT rDT P e P + P 1 e P (Ch + Cd ) Pr e + \u0001 \u0001 (r+)DT r(r + ) P D 1 erT + Dr eT 1 e According to Figure 2, the present value TC (T ), for the first period is repeated at the start of each of the subsequent cycles. The present value of the total cost for N cycles, TC (T ) can be calculated as follows: \u0001 T C(T ) = P 1 + erT + e2rT + ... + e(N 1)rT Figure 2. Cash Flow Diagram For an infinite planning horizon, N and TC (T ) can be expressed as \u0012 \u0013 1 T C(T ) = P 1 erT ! rDT C0 + DT C1 P C2 1 e P = + 1 erT r 1 erT \u0012 (r+)DT rDT \u0013 \u0012 \u0013 rDT P e e P 1e P Pr + P 1erT D 1erT Ch + Cd ! (r+)DT + (17) P e (eT 1) r(r + ) +Dr rT 1e The present value of the total cost function TC (T ) is a function of the length of the cycle T . Taking the first derivative of TC (T ) w.r.t. T and equating to zero, and using a common denominator and after some simplifications, the equation can PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL 1163 be written as follows: d (T C) dT rT 1e = Ch +Cd + r(r+) \u0010 \u0011 (1 erT ) rD e rDT P P \u0011 \u0010 DC1 re (C0 + DT C1 ) + rDT rT re 1e P \u0011 \u0010 \u0001 (r+)DT rDT (r+)D 1 erT P + rD e e P P P Pr \u0010 \u0011 rDT rerT e (r+)DT P e P n \u0011 \u0010 \u0011o \u0010 \u0001 rD rDT rDT rT rT P P e re 1e +P 1 e P (r+)DT T P e e \u0001 \u0001 (r+)DT rT (r+)D +Dr T 1 e P e 1 e P (r+)DT (eT 1) P rerT (eT 1)e \u0001 rT P C2 r =0 Multiply both sides by erT and simplify ( ) rDT P \u0001 (erT\u0010 1) Dr e \u0011 P C2 P e 1 DC1 r(C0 + DT C1 ) + r rDT r 1 e P \u0010 \u0011 \u0001 (r+)DT rDT erT 1 (r+)D e P + rD e P P P Pr \u0011 \u0010 (r+)DT rDT r e P e P n \u0010 \u0011o \u0001 rDT rDT erT 1 rD e P r 1e P h +Cd +P P + Cr(r+) (r+)DT T P e e \u0001 (r+)D \u0001 (r+)DT rT +Dr T e 1 P e 1 e P (r+)DT P re (eT 1) rT = rC0 \u0013 r2 T 2 P C2 r2 T 2 rT + DC1 rC0 + DT rC1 ) + { ( rT + ) 2 r 2 \u0012 \u0013 \u0012 \u0013 Dr rDT r2 D2 T 2 rDT r2 D2 T 2 Ch + Cd 1 + r }+ P P 2P 2 P 2P 2 r(r + ) \u0012 \u0013 2 2 r T (r + )D (r + )D [ Pr { rT + ( (1 + 2 P P \u0012 \u0013 2 (r + ) D2 T 2 rD rDT r2 D2 T 2 ) + 1 + ) 2P 2 P P 2P 2 \u0012 [ 2 (r + )DT (r + ) D2 T 2 rDT r2 D2 T 2 + 1+ )} 2 2P P \u0013 2P 2 \u0012 P 2 2\u0013 \u0012 r T rD rDT r2 D2 T 2 +P { rT + 1 + 2 P P 2P 2 \u0012 \u0013 \u0012 \u0013 2 2 2 r D T r2 T 2 rDT } + Dr { rT + ( ( 1 + T r P 2P 2 2 r( 1 1164 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN \u0012 \u0013 2 2 T 2 2 T 2 (r + )DT (r + ) D2 T 2 ) + T + + )( 1 + 2 P 2P 2 2 2 (r + )D (r + )DT (r + ) D2 T 2 )) (1 + P P 2P 2 ! \u0012 \u0013 2 2 T 2 (r + )DT (r + ) D2 T 2 r T + 1 + 2 P 2P 2 ( ) } ] ] = rC0 Applying this expression and ignoring the cubit and higher terms, which are very close to zero, the above equation can be reduced to, \u0012 \u0013 P C2 P Dr3 T 2 r3 D2 T 2 DC1 r2 T 2 + 2 r 2P 2 ) ( 3 2 2 r(r+)2 D 2 T 2 D T r 2P 2 2 2P Pr r 2 (r+)DT 2 r 3 DT 2 (Ch + Cd ) n 32P2 2 + 3 2P2 o + = rC0 r D T r DT + r(r + ) +P 2 2P n 2P o 2 2 2 2 r(r+)DT 2 +Dr + r 2T + r T2 P \u0014 \u0015 P Dr2 C1 + Dr2 C2 (P D) T2 2P # " 2 2 D D 2 r 2 (r+) (Ch + Cd ) r(r+) 2P 2P = rC0 + 2 Dr(r+) (r + ) D r(r+) + P 2 \u0014 \u0015 \u0014 \u0015 P C1 + C2 (P D) Ch + Cd rD2 Dr Dr r2 D T2 + + T2 2P 2P P 2 = rC0 \u0015 \u0014 2 \u0015 \u0014 rD D2 r Dr P C1 + C2 (P D) T 2 + (Ch + Cd ) + T 2 = rC0 r2 D 2P 2P P 2 \u0014 \u0015 \u0015 \u0014 P C1 + C2 (P D) D D2 rD T 2 + (Ch + Cd ) + T 2 = C0 2P 2P 2 rD(P C1 + C2 (P D)) 2 (Ch + Cd )D(P D) 2 T + T = C0 2P 2P [Dr(P C1 + C2 (P D) + (Ch + Cd )D(P D)] T 2 = 2P C0 T 2 [P DrC1 + DC2 r(P D) + D(P D)(Ch + Cd ] = 2P C0 Therefore, T 2 = 2P C0 P DrC1 + DC2 r(P D) + (Ch + Cd )D(P D) The optimal cycle time can be defined as s T = 2P C0 P DrC1 + D(P D)(rC2 + Ch + Cd ) (18) PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL and 1165 d2 (T C) > 0. The corresponding production quantity is dT 2 s 2P DC0 Therefore, Q = Pr C1 + (P D)(rC2 + Ch + Cp ) (19) Numerical example. Let us consider the cost parameters P = 5000 units, D = 4500 units, Ch =10,C1 =10, C2 =90, C0 =100, = 0.01 to 0.10, r= 0.01 to 0.10. Optimum solution. Optimum Quantity Q* = 835.27; T1 = 0.1671, T = 0.1856, Q1 = 83.53 Production cost = 449661.72, Setup cost = 538.75, Holding cost = 417.14, Deteriorating cost = 41.71, and Total cost = 450659.32. Table 3. Variation of Rate of Deteriorating Items with inventory and total Cost T Q 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.1856 0.1788 0.1727 0.1672 0.1622 0.1576 0.1534 0.1494 0.1458 0.1424 835.27 804.66 777.19 752.35 729.76 709.08 690.06 672.5 656.22 641.06 Setup cost 538.75 559.24 579.01 598.12 616.64 634.63 652.11 669.14 685.75 701.96 Production cost 449661.72 449674.11 449685.24 449695.3 449704.45 449712.82 449720.52 449727.64 449734.23 449740.37 Holding cost 417.14 401.87 388.17 375.78 364.5 354.19 344.7 335.93 327.81 320.24 Deteriorating cost 41.71 80.37 116.45 150.31 182.25 212.51 241.29 268.75 295.02 320.24 Total cost 450659.32 450715.6 450768.87 450819.51 450867.85 450914.15 450958.62 451001.46 451042.81 451082.81 From the table 3, it is observed that a study of rate of deteriorative items with cycle time, optimum quantity, setup cost, production cost, holding cost, deteriorating cost and total cost. When the rate of deteriorative items increases then setup cost, production cost, deteriorating cost and total cost also increases, then there is positive relation between them. When the rate of deteriorative items increases then the cycle time, optimum quantity, holding cost decreases then there is negative relationship between them. Table 4. Variation of rate of interest with inventory and total Cost r T Q 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.1856 0.1733 0.1631 0.1546 0.1472 0.1409 0.1352 0.1302 0.1258 0.1217 835.27 779.81 734.11 695.61 662.59 633.87 608.58 586.1 565.94 547.72 Setup cost 538.75 577.06 612.98 646.92 679.15 709.93 739.42 767.79 795.14 821.58 Production cost 449661.72 449368.35 449108.05 448873.11 448658.26 448459.71 448274.67 448101.04 447937.16 447781.72 Holding cost 417.14 389.05 365.92 346.44 329.75 315.24 302.47 291.11 280.94 271.75 Deteriorating cost 41.71 38.91 36.59 34.64 32.97 31.52 30.25 29.11 28.09 27.17 Total cost 450659.32 450373.39 450123.55 449901.12 449700.14 449516.4 449346.81 449189.06 449041.33 448902.23 1166 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN From the table 4, a study of rate of interest with cycle time, optimum quantity, setup cost, production cost, holding cost, deteriorating cost and total cost. When the rate of interest increases then setup cost increases, then there is positive relation between them. When the rate of interest items increases then the cycle time, optimum quantity, production cost, holding cost, deteriorating cost and total cost decreases then there is negative relationship between them. Sensitivity analysis. The total cost functions are the real solution in which the model parameters are assumed to be static values. It is reasonable to study the sensitivity i.e. the effect of making chances in the model parameters over a given optimum solution. It is important to find the effects on different system performance measures, such as cost function, inventory system, etc. For this purpose, sensitivity analysis of various system parameters for the models of this research are required to observe whether the current solutions remain unchanged, the current solutions become infeasible, etc. Table 5. Effect of Demand and cost parameters on optimal values Parameters 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Optimum values T T1 Q Q1 Total Cost 0.1856 0.167 835.27 83.53 450659.32 0.1788 0.1609 804.66 80.47 450715.6 0.1727 0.1554 777.19 77.72 450768.87 0.1672 0.1504 752.35 75.23 450819.51 0.1622 0.146 729.75 72.98 450867.85 Observations. 1. With the increase in the rate of deteriorating items ( ), cycle time, production time and optimum quantity, the maximum inventory decreases but total cost increases. 2. With the increase in the rate of interest (r), cycle time, production time and optimum quantity, the maximum production and total cost decreases. 3. With the increase in setup cost per unit (C0 ) , cycle time, production time, optimum quantity, the maximum time and total cost increases. 4. With the increase in holding cost per unit (Ch ), cycle time, production time, optimum quantity, the maximum inventory and total cost increases. 5. Similarly, other parameters C1 , C2 can also be observed from the table 5. Note. The above formulae can be reduced to the standard equation of the optimal production quantity and cycle time when the value of C1 , C2 ,r, and are equal to zero, then s T = 2P C0 and Q = Ch D(P D) s 2DP C0 (P D)Ch Case (ii). In the second case, the setup cost and the production cost are assumed to be incurred at the beginning of each cycle and the inventory holding cost is incurred continuously during the period T . To incorporate the effect of time value of money into the equations, the difference between the interest rate and inflation PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL r C0 C1 Ch C2 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 80 90 100 110 120 8 9 10 11 12 8 9 10 11 12 80 90 100 110 120 0.1856 0.1733 0.1631 0.1546 0.1472 0.166 0.1761 0.1856 0.1939 0.2025 0.1871 0.1863 0.1856 0.1849 0.1842 0.1856 0.1932 0.1856 0.1788 0.1727 0.1863 0.1856 0.1849 0.1842 0.1835 0.167 0.156 0.1468 0.1391 0.1325 0.1494 0.1585 0.167 0.1745 0.1829 0.1684 0.1677 0.167 0.1664 0.1658 0.1671 0.1739 0.167 0.1609 0.1554 0.1677 0.167 0.1664 0.1658 0.1651 835.27 779.81 734.11 695.61 662.59 747.09 792.41 835.27 872.66 911.46 841.82 838.52 835.27 832.05 828.87 835.27 869.66 835.27 804.66 777.19 838.52 835.27 832.05 828.87 825.72 83.53 77.98 73.41 69.56 66.26 74.71 79.24 83.53 87.27 91.15 84.18 83.85 83.53 83.21 82.89 83.53 86.96 83.53 80.47 77.72 83.85 83.53 82.2 82.89 82.57 1167 450659.32 450373.37 450123.55 449901.12 449700.14 450589.76 450625.51 450659.32 495653.91 495682.96 441656.07 446157.7 450659.32 455160.94 459662.56 450659.32 450599.53 450659.32 450715.6 450768.87 405695.43 450659.32 495623.5 540587.96 585552.71 rate is calculated as r, the inflation free or real interest rate representing the time value of money. That is, r = R f . (i) Production Cost = QCP = DTCp (20) (ii) Ordering Cost = C0 (21) (iii) Holding Cost : Holding cost is applicable to both stages of the production cycle, as described by T Z1 ZT HC = Ch I(t)ert dt + I(t)ert dt 0 T1 T Z1 ZT \u0010 \u0011 \u0001 P D D = Ch 1 et ert dt + e(T t) 1 ert dt 0 T1 T Z1 ZT \u0010 \u0011 \u0010 \u0011 P D rt D T (r+t)t = Ch e e(r+)t dt + e ert dt 0 " = Ch P D T1 \u001a \u001b rt T1 e(r+)t e r+ r 0 D + \u001a ert eT (r+)t r r+ \u001bT # T1 1168 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN \b \u0015 (P \bD) re(r+)T1 (r + )erT1 + +D erT rerT1 eT1 + reT .e(r+)T1 \u0011 \u0010 \u0011 \u0010 (r+)DT rDT rDT P P P e + P 1 e Pr e Ch = \u0001 \u0001 (r+)DT r(r + ) P D 1 erT + Dr eT 1 e = Ch r(r + ) \u0014 (22) (iv) Deteriorating Cost/unit time: Deteriorating cost, which is applicable to both stages of the production cycle. Therefore, T Z1 ZT DC =Cd I1 (t)ert dt + I2 (t)ert dt 0 T1 \u0011 \u0010 \u0011 rDT rDT e P + P 1 e P Cd Pr e = \u0001 \u0001 (r+)DT r(r + ) rT T P D 1 e + Dr e 1 e \u0010 (r+)DT P (23) Assuming continuous compounding and a constant setup cost C0 , the present value of the total cost of the inventory system for the first cycle, TC (T ), can be expressed as, \u0010 (r+)DT \u0011 rDT P Pr e e P \u0011 \u0010 (Ch + Cd ) \u0001 +P 1 e rDT = C0 + DT CP + (24) P D 1 erT r(r + ) \u0001 (r+)DT P +Dr eT 1 e According to figure 2, the present value of the total cost is multiplied by \u0013 \u0012 1 TC(T ) = P 1 erT The present value of the total cost: \u0012 (r+)DT rDT \u0013 P e P e Pr 1erT \u0012 \u0013 rDT P Ch + Cd +P 1e rT D + 1e r(r + ) ! (r+)DT P e (eT 1) +Dr 1erT C0 + DT CP 1 erT (25) The present value of the total cost function TC (T ) is a function of the length of the cycle (T ). Taking the first derivative of TC (T ) w.r.t. (T ) and equating to zero, and using a common denominator and same procedure used in case (i) and after some simplifications, DCP r2 T 2 D(P D)r(Ch + Cd )T 2 + = rC0 2\u0014 2P \u0015 DCp r (Ch + Cd )D T2 + (P D) = C0 2 2P 2P C0 T2 = P DrCP + (Ch + Cd )D(P D) s 2P C0 therefore, T = P DrCP + D(P D)(Ch + Cd ) (26) PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL and 2 T 2 1169 > 0. The corresponding production quantity is s 2DP C0 therefore, Q = Pr CP + (P D)(Ch + Cp ) (27) Numerical example. Let us consider the cost parameters P = 5000 units, D = 4500 units, Ch =10,Cp = 100, C0 =100, = 0.01 to 0.10, r=0.01 to 0.10. Optimum solution. Optimum Quantity Q* = 654.65; T1 = 0.1309, T = 0.1455, Q1 =65.46, Production cost = 450,000, Setup cost = 687.38, Holding cost = 327.02, Deteriorating cost = 32.70, and Total cost = 451047.11. Table 6. Variation of Rate of Deteriorating Items with inventory and total Cost T Q .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 0.1455 0.1421 0.1391 0.1361 0.1333 0.1307 654.65 639.6 625.54 612.37 600 588.35 .07 .08 .09 .10 0.1283 0.126 0.1238 0.1217 Setup Production Holding Deteriorating Total cost cost cost cost cost 687.38 450000 327.02 32.7 451047.11 703.56 450000 319.51 63.9 451086.98 719.37 450000 312.5 93.75 451125.62 734.85 450000 305.92 122.37 451163.38 750 450000 300 150 451199.62 764.85 450000 293.93 176.36 451235.14 577.35 566.95 557.09 547.72 779.42 793.72 807.77 821.58 450000 450000 450000 450000 288.44 283.25 278.32 273.65 201.91 226.6 250.49 273.65 451269.77 451303.57 451336.59 451368.88 From the table 6 is a study of the rate of deteriorative items with cycle time, optimum quantity, setup cost, production cost, holding cost, deteriorating cost and total cost. When the rate of deteriorative items increases, the setup cost, deteriorating cost and total cost increases, as a result there is positive relation between them. When the rate of deteriorative items increases, the cycle time, optimum quantity and holding cost decreases that results in a negative relationship between them. The Table 7 is a study of the rate of interest with cycle time, optimum quantity, setup cost, production cost, holding cost, deteriorating cost and total cost. When the rate of interest increases, the setup cost and total cost increases. Then there is positive relation between them. When the rate of interest items increases, the cycle time, optimum quantity, production cost, holding cost and deteriorating cost decreases. Then there is negative relationship between them. Sensitivity analysis. The total cost functions are the real solutions in which the model parameters are assumed to be static values. It is reasonable to study the sensitivity i.e. the effect of making changes in the model parameters over a given optimum solution. It is important to find the effects on different system performance measures, such as cost function, inventory system, etc. For this purpose, sensitivity 1170 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN Table 7. Variation of rate of interest with inventory and total Cost r T Q .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 0.1455 0.1197 0.1041 0.0933 0.0853 0.0791 0.0741 0.0699 0.0663 0.0633 654.65 538.82 468.52 420.08 384.11 356.03 333.33 314.48 298.51 284.74 Setup Production Holding Deteriorating Total cost cost cost cost cost 687.38 450000 327.02 32.7 451047.1 835.16 450000 268.99 26.9 451131.1 960.47 450000 233.8 23.38 451217.7 1071.21 450000 209.54 20.95 451301.7 1171.54 450000 191.54 19.15 451382.2 1263.92 450000 177.48 1.75 451459.2 1350 450000 166.12 16.61 451532.7 1430.91 450000 156.68 15.67 451603.3 1507.48 450000 148.69 14.87 451671 1580.35 450000 141.8 14.18 451736.3 analysis of various system parameters for the models of this research are required to be observed whether the current solutions remain unchanged, the current solutions become infeasible, etc. Observations. 1. With the increase in the rate of deteriorating items (), cycle time, production time and optimum quantity, the maximum inventory decreases but total cost increases. 2. With the increase in the rate of interest (r), cycle time, production time and optimum quantity, the maximum production decreases but total cost increases. 3. With the increase in setup cost per unit (C0 ) , cycle time, production time, optimum quantity, the maximum time and total cost increases. 4. With the increase in holding cost per unit (Ch ), cycle time, production time, optimum quantity, the maximum inventory decreases but total cost increases. 5. Similarly, other parameters Cp , Cd , can also be observed from the table 8. Note. The above formulae can be reduced to the standard equations of optimal production quantity and cycle time when the value of r and are equal to zero. s s 2P C0 2DP C0 T = and Q = Ch D(P D) (P D)Ch 4. Conclusion. The deterministic inventory control problem was considered for the determination of optimal production quantities for items with constant demand rate, while considering the effect of time value of money. Two different models are developed. In the first model, deterioration is considered and in the second model, deterioration with time value of money is considered. In the second model, two different production cost functions are considered. In the first case, the production cost is incurred at the beginning of the cycle, while in the second, the production cost consists of two parts: an initial cost, which is incurred at the beginning of the cycle and is applied to the entire quantity produced during the cycle and a running cost that is incurred as production progresses and is applied to the individual units produced. Closed formulae were obtained for the optimal cycle time and the corresponding optimal production quantity for the models without shortage. Numerical PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL 1171 Table 8. Effect of Demand and cost parameters on optimal values Optimum values Parameters r C0 Ch Cp Cd 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 80 90 100 110 120 8 9 10 11 12 80 90 100 110 120 80 90 100 110 120 T T1 Q Q1 0.1455 0.1421 0.139 0.1361 0.1333 0.1455 0.1197 0.1041 0.0933 0.0854 0.1301 0.138 0.1455 0.1526 0.1594 0.1529 0.1491 0.1455 0.1421 0.139 0.1529 0.1491 0.1455 0.1421 0.139 0.1462 0.1458 0.1455 0.1451 0.1448 0.1309 0.1279 0.1251 0.1225 0.12 0.1309 0.1078 0.0987 0.084 0.0768 0.1171 0.1242 0.1309 0.1373 0.1434 0.1376 0.1342 0.1309 0.1279 0.1251 0.1376 0.1342 0.1309 0.1279 0.1251 0.1316 0.1312 0.1309 0.1306 0.1303 654.65 639.6 625.54 612.37 600 654.65 538.81 468.52 420.08 384.11 585.54 621.06 654.65 686.61 717.14 688.25 670.82 654.65 639.6 625.54 688.25 670.82 654.65 639.6 625.54 657.79 656.22 654.65 653.1 651.56 65.46 63.96 62.55 61.24 60 65.46 53.88 46.85 42.01 38.41 58.55 62.11 65.46 68.66 71.71 68.82 67.08 65.46 63.96 62.55 68.82 67.08 65.46 63.96 62.55 65.78 65.62 65.46 65.31 65.16 Total cost 451047.1 451087 451125.6 451163.1 451199.6 451047.1 451131.1 451217.7 451301.7 451382.2 450936.6 450993.4 451047.1 451098.2 451147 450963.3 451005.9 451047.1 451087 451125.6 361032 406039.4 451047.1 496055 541063.1 451039 451043.1 451047.1 451051.2 451055.2 examples were presented and sensitivity analysis was performed. This research can be extended as follows: 1. In developing the models, only one concept was introduced at a time, along with time value of money. One may investigate models with a combination of several concepts and determine the optimal polices for these cases. 2. Another extension to this research could be an attempt to prove the convexity of the total cost function where the interest rate is included in the total cost function. 3. The models developed in this research were considered for a single item. One may relax this assumption and consider models with multiple items. 4. The production rate in all the models was constant and the demand rate was either constant or increasing linearly over time. Other extension to this research could be to consider probabilistic demand or production rate. 1172 V. CHOUDRI, M. VENKATACHALAM AND S. PANAYAPPAN The proposed model can assist the manufacturer and retailer in accurately determining the optimal quantity, cycle time and inventory total cost. Moreover, the proposed inventory model can be used in inventory control of certain items such as food items, fashionable commodities, stationery stores and others. REFERENCES [1] J. A. Buzacott, Economic order quantities with inflation, Operational Research, 26 (1979), 553-558. [2] C.-Y. Dye, H.-J. Chang and C.-H. Wu, Purchase-inventory decision models for deteriorating items with a temporary sale price, Internat. J. Inform. Management Sci., 18 (2007), 17-35. [3] S. Eilon and R. V. Mallaya Issuing and pricing policy of semi-perishables, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Operational Research, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1966. [4] P. M. Ghare and G. F. Schrader, A model for exponentially decaying inventory, J. Indust. Eng., 14 (1963), 238-243. [5] J. Min, et al., An EPQ model for deteriorating items with inventory-level-dependent demand and permissible delay in payments, Internat. J. Systems Sci., 43 (2012), 1039-1053. [6] I. Moon and S. Lee, The effects of inflation and time-value of money on an economic order quantity model with a random product life cycle, European J. Oper. Res., 125 (2000), 588- 601. [7] G. Moslehi, M. Rasti Barzoki and M. Fathollah Bayati, The effect of inflation and time value of money on lot sizing by considering of rework in an inventory control model, Internat. J. Indust. Eng. Prod. Man., 22 (2011), 181-192. [8] A. Roy and G. P. Samanta, Inventory model with two rates of production for deteriorating items with permissible delay in payments, Internat. J. Systems Sci., 42 (2011), 1375-1386. [9] B. Sarkar and I. Moon, An EPQ model with inflation in an imperfect production system, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 6159-6167. [10] N. H. Shah, Inventory model for deteriorating items and time value of money for a finite time horizon under the permissible delay in payments, Internat. J. Systems Sci., 37 (2006), 9-15. [11] S. R. Singh and R. Jain, On reserve money for an EOQ model in an inflationary environment under supplier credit, OPSEARCH , 46 (2009), 303-320. [12] S. Singh, R. Dube and S. R. Singh, Production model with selling price dependent demand and partially backlogging under inflation, Internat. J. Math. Mod. Comput., 1 (2011), 1-7. [13] H.-M. Wee, Economic production lot size model for deteriorating items with partial back ordering, Comp. Indust. Eng., 24 (1993), 449-458. [14] H.-M. Wee and S.-T. Law, Economic production lot size for deteriorating items taking account of the time value of money, Comp. Oper. Res., 26 (1999), 545-558. [15] J. C. P. Yu, et al., The effects of inflation and time value of money on a production model with a random product life cycle, Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res., 27 (2010), 437-456. Received October 2014; 1st revision April 2015; 2nd revision May 2015. E-mail address: schouarts@gmail.com E-mail address: venkatmaths@gmail.com E-mail address: panayappan@gmail.com Copyright of Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization is the property of American Institute of Mathematical Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. FINANCE ARTICLE REVIEWS (Approximately 3-4 pages, 4 page maximum): You must properly cite the article at the beginning of your review (author, date, article title, journal publication, pages, etc.). If you obtained a copy via Internet resources, provide explicit instructions on how to obtain the article via the Internet. Your article being reviewed must come from a scholarly / academic finance journal (SEE ATTACHED). To qualify as an academic journal article, it must include a list of citations/references. I recommend using PROQUEST or other online library databases available through Bellevue University's library to locate a finance journal. The key requirement is that the articles MUST address a finance issue/concept, such as those discussed in the course or text. TIME VALUE OF MONEY ANALYSIS. Your review must have 5 clearly identified sections, as follows: #1) Section 1 heading = \"Original Work Statement\": Verify the review is original work prepared solely for this class by including the following statement: \"I, (insert your name), verify that this article review is solely my own work and creation and it has been prepared solely for credit in this class, and that this review, including the \"main issue of the article\" section has been written in my own words.\" #2) Section 2 heading = \"Article Citation\": provide a full & complete citation of the article being reviewed (author, date, article title, publication title, pages, etc.) and how/where article was accessed; Use APA or similar style. Do NOT copy a long list of information from Proquest or similar database. #3) Section 3 heading = \"Main Issue of Article\" -- clearly & succinctly summarize what the MAIN ISSUE of the article is, and the key points regarding that issue. Communicate a clear, simple, straight-forward message that your peers can follow and understand, and learn from. DO NOT \"DATA DUMP.\" #4) Section 4 heading = \"Relationship to Course\" -- clearly state how the article relates to this course : briefly discuss what sections, chapters, and/or concepts of this course are related to this article. #5) Section 5 heading = \"Personal Reflection and Comments\" -- your reaction or observations regarding the content. Indicate what you think of the content, its significance and implications, etc. Article reviews & other work submitted in this class MUST be original work you complete solely for this class. Work previously submitted for another class may not be submitted for credit in this class. The reviews will be evaluated on adherence to the assignment (must have above required sections clearly labeled in the review), the clarity, efficiency, and effectiveness of communication of the main issues, its relevance to this course, the appropriate use of financial terms, the level of thought communicated (particularly with respect to your reaction/observations), grammatical accuracy (spelling, sentence structure), etc. See schedule for due dates