Please help me with the first part which is News Article Analysis based on the article I attached below. Thank you. Article: https://phys.orgews/2023-03-framework-honest-behavior.html

MARCH 6, 2023 New framework on honest behavior suggests it is a process that goes beyond not lying Editors' notes by Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University facts facts facts facts facts fac facts facts facts facts facts facts fa. facts facts facts far facts fo facts to facts facts facts f facts fac facts facts facts facts facts ts acts facts facts facts facts facts acts facts facts cts facts facts fact facts facts fact acts facts facts cts facts facts fact facts facts facts sets facts facts acts facts facts fa facts facts facts acts facts facts fo facts fad facts facts facts Credit: Pixabay/CCO Public Domain s facts facts fo ets facts facts s +s facts facts acts facts fact. "cts fact Most people value honesty while also recognizing that it is sometimes beneficial to be dishonest. This tension leads individuals to engage in behaviors that stretch the boundaries of honest behavior, such as strategically avoiding information, dodging questions, and making misleading statements. In a new article, researchers reviewed work from a range of disciplines to telling the truth or lying. develop a framework that highlights how honest behavior encompasses much more than the commonly held view of eitherThe article, by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), the University of Chicago, Northwestern University, and Wake Forest University, is in the Academy of Management Annals. Based on their findings, the authors say the narrow focus on honest content, which largely reduces the study of honesty to lying versus truth-telling, is problematic and connected to modern day societal challenges such as the spread of misinformation. Instead, they suggest that honest behavior is a complex phenomenon that is more than a single behavior focused on truth-telling; it is a broader relational act of communication. "Honest behavior has relational elementsfor example, fostering an accurate understanding in others through what we disclose and how we communicateand intellectual elements for example, evaluating information for accuracy, searching for explains Taya Cohen, Associate Professor of Organizational Behavior and Business Ethics at CMU's Tepper School of Business, who coauthored the article. & Dashboard X Management in the News #2 X New framework on honest be X ok 3 > C 25 phys.orgews/2023-03-framework-honest-behavior.html h* 4 @ 0O D o 6 f , Researchers reviewed nearly 170 empirical articles published ::Z;::;'::a?,;s;:,z:.;r between 2000 and 2021, covering the fields of management, 9 HOURS AGO izati ior, applied psychology, and i . They identified four distinct facets of honest behavior, and 0 Share highlighted that the process of being fully honest begins with communicators forming accurate beliefs based on a process of evaluation, search and incorporation (intellectual honesty), sharing their beliefs truthfully without lying (honest content), ensuring that they provide sufficient disclosure without leaving out relevant information (honest disclosure), and doing so in a way that allows listeners to form an accurate understanding of the message (honest delivery). Unveiling inaoside A: An antioxidant derived from mushrooms 24 Email Materials research explores design rules and synthesis of quantum memory candidates Relevant PhysicsForums posts As part of this process, the authors outlined findings regarding Music to Lift Your Soul: 4 Genres & the antecedents and consequences for each of these facets of Honorable Mention . i . . 8 HOURS AGO honest behavior, concluding that engaging in honest behavior i o . . Biographies, history, personal accounts has consequences for both communicators and listeners, on an N S HOURS AGD individual, social and organizational level. Additionally, to Cover songs versus the original track, generate ideas to guide future research, the authors highlighted which ones are better? findings from a variety of other fields, such as social psychology J AZHOURS AGO and communication, while also connecting honest behavior to other prominent concepts in the management literature (e.g., voice/silence, psychological safety) that have not included discussions of honesty. Interesting Words 18 HOURS AGO Two-tone, Ska rock ) MAR 10, 2024 Serious science is alive and well.... ) MAR 10, 2024 The framework has practical implications for individuals and More from Art, Music, History, and Linguistics organizations wishing to increase honesty, the authors suggest. It can be used to encourage people to seek truthful information, update their beliefs based on this information. and attemot to . Researchers reviewed nearly 170 empirical articles published between 2000 and 2021, covering the fields of management, organizational behavior, applied psychology, and business highlighted that the process of being fully honest begins with communicators forming accurate beliefs based on a process of evaluation, search and incorporation (intellectual honesty), sharing their beliefs truthfully without lying (honest content), ensuring that they provide sufficient disclosure without leaving out relevant information (honest disclosure), and doing so in a way that allows listeners to form an accurate understanding of the message (honest delivery). As part of this process, the authors outlined findings regarding the antecedents and consequences for each of these facets of honest behavior, concluding that engaging in honest behavior has consequences for both communicators and listeners, on an individual, social and organizational level. Additionally, to generate ideas to guide future research, the authors highlighted findings from a variety of other fields, such as social psychology other prominent concepts in the management literature (e.g., voice/silence, psychological safety) that have not included discussions of honesty. The framework has practical implications for individuals and organizations wishing to increase honesty, the authors suggest. It can be used to encourage people to seek truthful information, update their beliefs based on this information, and attempt to foster true beliefs in others as part of the information-sharing process, to create a safe and inclusive workplace environment. "We must consider not just what people do or do not say, but also how beliefs are formed, the extent to which beliefs are updated when needed, and whether recipients walk away from communication exchanges with the same beliefs that communicators meant to convey," says Benny Cooper, a Post- Doctoral Fellow in Organizational Behavior and Theory at CMU's Tepper School of Business, who led the study. "It is only by understanding all these nuanced honesty-related behaviors that we can develop effective methods for cultivating the virtue of honesty in people and organizations." More information: Binyamin Cooper et al, Honest Behavior: Truth- Seeking, Belief-Speaking, and Fostering Understanding of the Truth in Others, Academy of Management Annals (2023). DOI: 10.5465/annals.2021.0209 Provided by Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University (2 Overall Grading criteria: * Demonstrate a thorough understanding of organizational behaviour concepts (correctly identify, define, review, and apply the key concepts). e Correctly integrate your understanding of course concepts and theories with relevant issues or events (correctly explain where and how the theory/concepts apply to the article). * Produce a well-crafted document. You are expected to present your ideas in a coherent and persuasive manner. Your paper will be reviewed for spelling, grammar, layout, formal writing, and referencing. All written assignments are expected to be well organized and readable. * You must have all components of the assignment included: Summary, Connection to OB, and Concluding Insights. Use additional headings as appropriate. Part I: News Article Analysis Total Score (out Scale/Range Connection to OB (Application) 'Writing Fluency, Spelling, and Grammar of 40): Management in the News Assignment Marking Rubric - 8w | 0 s7 0 00 46 00| @00 13 00| Meets Standards Approaching Standards Below Standards Unsatisfactory Comments Information from news article is clearly summarized. Many supporting details address the who, what, where, when, why or how questions. A detailed, high level overview of the article Insightfully makes multiple connections to OB concepts or issues. Appropriately uses OB terminology and identifies relevant OB topics. Applies more details from the article and demonstrates understanding of the relevance of course concepts Effective and engaging use of word choice to make writing interesting. Formal English is used. Writing is clear and easy to understand. No grammar and/or spelling errors Information from news article is clearly summarized but lacks some detail. Few supporting details address the who, what, where, when, why, or how questions. Makes a few connections to OB concepts or issues. Uses several OB terms and identifies relevant OB topics, however some applications are missing. Uses a variety of vocabulary. A few inaccuracies, but these do not interfere with understanding. Very few run-on sentences. Essay is fairly easy to understand. Very few grammar and/or spelling errors Summary may be unclear or incomplete. There is a need for more supporting details. Attempts to make appropriate connections to OB concepts and issues but lacks sufficient detail to establish a full connection. Does not use appropriate terminology from textbook. Information is simply copied from the text with limited individual application. Shows some use of varied word choice, but with some inaccuracies. Some run-on sentences Some difficulty in understanding the essay. Some grammar and/or spelling errors Too much information was copied from the article or important details are left out. Details or summary may be confusing. Connection is inappropriate to the content of the article. Information is simply copied from the text with no individual application. Careless or inaccurate word choice, which obscures meaning. Informal language is used. Frequent run on sentences. Significant difficulty understanding the essay. Frequent grammar and/or spelling errors which significantly interfere with understanding. Concluding Insights Provides a detailed and compelling reason for why this article was appealing from an OB perspective and outlines thoughtful future considerations. Provides some explanation for why this article was appealing from an OB perspective and outlines appropriate future considerations. Provides an unclear explanation for why this article was appealing from an OB perspective. Future considerations are unclear and/or not linked to the content of the article. Limited or no explanation for why this article was appealing from an OB perspective. Future considerations are not relevant to the article or they are not outlined. Deductions: Meets Standard Below Standard (Deduct up to 5 marks) Sources of information are not cited or sources of information are cited but some citations may be missing or style may be inconsistent. Citations APA in-text citations, incorrectly: -1 APA reference incorrectly: - 1 APA reference list incorrectly (i.e. not in alphabetical order): -1 No-intext citations: - 2.5 marks No reference list: - 2.5 marks No in-text citations or no reference list: -5 marks High Turnitin similarity (>20%), overall grade of zero, grade breakdown will be provided Below Standard (Deduct up to 5 marks) Sources of information, including article and textbook, are fully cited in- text in APA format. Article and textbook are appropriately referenced in APA format in a reference list at the end of the document. Meets Standard The article is current and from a reputable source related to a topic or theme within Organizational Behaviour. The information is easy to understand. The article (cut out or printed) was submitted with the Current Event Assignment. The article is dated, not from a reputable source; is not related to OB, is not included with the assignment. Deduct between 1 and 3 marks (e.g. 1 mark if the article is dated, 3 marks if the article is not included). Part II: Reflection Grade the extent to which the student's reflection paper meets the following criteria (out of 10) e 2-page (maximum, double-spaced) * Focuses on lessons learned pertaining to the chosen topic e Provides a thoughtful explanation of the topic and reflection on reactions to the topic o Describe related past experiences or lack of experience o Describe how learning about this topic has impacted you as a learner, as a future business professional, as a team member, as a member of the community o Describe how learning about this topic has strengthened specific skills and/or competencies, etc. o Describe your personal reaction to and insights about what you have learned o Student shows evidence of thought, growth, deeper understanding o What do you now understand about this topic? Have you gained any new insights? o Are there new or additional questions you have after learning about this topic? o Are there gaps that you believe need to be filled in terms of better understanding or investigating this topic further in the future? o Have your perceptions changed in any way? o Student clearly reacts and provides an emotion driven response to learnings pertaining to this topic e Student reflects beyond simply summarizing what you've read or what was articulated in class Additional Reflection Grading Insights: Reflection Insights Reflection Insights From Ok to Good: From Good to GREAT! L. Make it personal (that's what a reflection entails)! 1. How has this course changed or supported your opinions/perspectives? (what 1. Discuss the content in relation to your personal or work experiences did you previously believe and what you think now? Why did you change 9. Explain the concepts in your own words your mind? Why does this matter for you personally or for your career/jobs?) 1. Avoid direct quotes or excerpts from articles or slides only 2. How has the course helped you better understand your personal and/or work experiences? Perhaps you are better able to articulate your experiences or 3. Ensure that your discussion accurately reflects relevant course N 1 ? 1 X : : explain the connection between work/personal behaviors, attitudes, feelings? concepts/knowledge. p : . \" : et 2 AT D 5 Support your ideas with whys and evidence from the course 3. What would you do differently because of this course learning? Why? How? If you were in charge, what would you do differently? If you could create 5. Provid details of amples t t the learnings. rovide more de oF your examples 1o cement the learnings your perfect company, what would that look like with regards to X? I. Details = \"why?\" and \"how?\" \"when?\" . . . . Y 5. Do you agree or disagree with the evidence presented in class? Why? When 6. Avoid discussing the topics/concepts and learnings in vague/general terms might it not hold up (are there some contexts we'd see this differently)? (as if you were not in the course . . . . . . asty ) 6. Can you integrate learnings from other weeks into this reflection? Does it 7. Ensure that your examples accurately reflect the topic at hand [not just a contradict, support, or provide another angle to the reflection? general work story) T VA pnerstyingzer _ % Jriversiyeindeer _