Please help me with this question:

Assessment Task 2 Question and Additional Instructions: Facts: Solarix Ltd was founded in 2010 in Sydney, Australia, with the vision of leading innovation in the renewable energy sector by developing sustainable solar energy solutions. The company specializes in the design, manufacture, and installation of high-efficiency solar panels and energy storage systems, serving both residential and commercial markets across Australia. Over the years, Solarix has grown from a small startup into a significant player in the renewable energy industry. The company's success has been driven by a strong commitment to sustainability and the adoption of advanced technologies that enhance the efficiency and affordability of solar energy. However, Solarix's rapid growth has also brought challenges, particularly in scaling its operations and maintaining robust corporate governance. Recent years have seen increasing internal and external pressures that threaten the company's stability and reputation. These issues have arisen from a mix of aggressive expansion strategies, questionable management decisions by its leadership, and external market competition that demands continuous innovation and compliance with stringent environmental standards. Some directors at Solarix have made strategic decisions without a thorough analysis of their potential impact, leading to substantial financial losses on failed projects. This includes the ill- advised investment in a new production facility that was based on overly optimistic market forecasts and did not account for competitive pressures, resulting in a significant write-down of assets. There have been instances where directors personally benefited from contracts awarded by the company. For example, a board member approved a lucrative contract for a supply company owned by a close relative without disclosing this relationship to the board or

RMIT Classification: Trustedrecusing themselves from the decision-making process. Directors have pursued expansion strategies that were more aligned with personal ambitions for company growth rather than with the financial health or strategic fit for Solarix, endangering the company's stability and shareholder value. The leadership failed to adequately respond to technological shifts in the market, clinging to outdated models and technologies that were being phased out by more innovative solutions, thereby putting the company at a strategic disadvantage. Directors did not implement robust risk management strategies commensurate with the company's growth trajectory. This oversight became evident when Solarix faced supply chain disruptions, which were exacerbated by inadequate contingency planning, leading to delays in project deliveries and damage to client relationships. Solarix has faced multiple fines for violating environmental laws due to the improper disposal of hazardous materials and non-compliance with safety standards in their manufacturing processes. This negligence reflects a broader disregard for legal obligations under the directors' oversight. What is more, there was a lack of transparent reporting on financial and operational issues, leading to shareholder distrust. For instance, significant operational losses were not promptly disclosed, affecting stock prices and investor confidence adversely. As Solarix stands at a critical juncture, the company's ability to address its internal governance issues and restore stakeholder confidence is crucial for its future success and sustainability in the competitive renewable energy market. The company must reform its board practices, enhance transparency, and rebuild trust to secure a sustainable future in the dynamic renewable energy market. This will involve not only revising internal controls and audit processes but also re-establishing a culture of ethical leadership and accountability at all levels of the organization. They hire your group as consultants. Group Task Description: As a group of consultants, you are assigned to thoroughly analyze the situation at Solarix Ltd and produce a comprehensive report. To ensure the rigor of your legal inquiry, conduct in- depth legal research to support your analysis. Use reputable legal databases such as Westlaw, LexisNexis, and HeinOnline to find relevant case law, law journals, and other scholarly sources. Clearly reference your sources using the Australian Guide to Legal Citation, 4th edition to underscore the thoroughness and accuracy of your legal investigation.

This is what I have to do

4. Application of laws and in-depth exploration of governance failures: Apply specific sections of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and relevant common law to the issues identified based on the facts of the question. This should include an analysis of legal obligations for directors and compliance requirements for corporate governance and examine instances where directors may have failed in their duties. Assess the adequacy of the current governance structures and identify the lapses that have led to the present challenges.

This is the rubric:

Criteria Legal Issues Laws/ Applications CLO1 Dremaonstrate an understanding of the relevant legal and factual issues relating to an Australian company and its operations, including evaluating, analysing. and applying relevant provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 and other relevant statutory and case law. Aligned with AoL Critically engaged (Evaluate and integrate existing ideas. engaging critically) F marks 9to +7.18 pts HD The izsue is clearly and accurately stated, recognizing all main points with no omissions or irrelevant details. The legal rule is fully guoted, citing all relevant case law and statutory provisions without errors. The analysis is comprehensive, applying legal rules to the facts effectively. demaonstrating a strong understanding of the subject matter. Relevant cases are cited and discussed. with comparisons to the facts and additional arguments where appropriate, showcasing original thinking. The answer is well-structured, free from irrelevant content, and the conclusion is well supported by the application. providing a clear recommendation. 7.18 to =628 pts Dl The issue is mastly clear and accurately stated with no irrelevant details. The legal rule is accurately quoted, and all relevant case law and statutory provisions are cited. though there are minor omissions such as misspelled party names. All relevant sub sections are cited without omission. and no irrelevant rules of law are included. The discussion provides a clear and comprehensive analysis of relevant legal rules and their application to the facts, demonstrating a strong understanding of the subject matter and accurate application of legal principles. The waork shows strong analysis with relevant cases cited and discussed. free from irrelevant content. The conclusion is well supported by the application arguments and explains how they address the issuels), with no irmelevant content. Ratings 6.28 to =5.38 pts CR The issue is moderately clear and accurately stabed, recognizing most issues with nao irrelevant details. The legal rule is mostly accurate and fully quoted, though there are minor omissions such as sub-sections of statutory provisions or misspelled party names. Mo irrelevant rules of law are included. The discussion analyzes most relevant legal principles and their application to the facts, supporting logical arguments about the resolution of the issue(s). The student shows a reasonable understanding of the subject matter with minor insignificant mistakes and a reasonable attempt to analyze the legal problemis) by applying relevant law. The student structures legal arguments without mere repetitions of facts or irrelevant applications. The conclusion is supported by most arguments and substantially addresses the izsuels), with no irrelevant content. 5.38 to ~4.48 pts PA The issue is incomplete, unclear, and/or inaccurate, though no irrelevant issues are included. The quoting of the legal rule is somawhat incomplete or inaccurate, and some relevant case law and statutory provisions are cited without including irrelevant rules of law. The discussion considers the application of some relevant legal rules to key facts, but the arguments are unclear or incomplete, with a tendency to apply unidentified legal rules. The waork attempts to apply relevant legal principles but contains considerable mistakes. lacks depth, and tends to repeat the facts outlined in the question, including unnecessary slabs from the facts without irrelevant discussion. The conclusion is supported by s0Mme arguments but mainly restates the issue. with no irrelevant conbent. 448 to =0 pts NN The legal issue is mot identified, or the identified issue is irrelevant. There is no guoting of the legal rule, or the guoting is incomplete or inaccurate, with irmelevant rules of law present. The discussion of the facts does nat refer to relevant legal rules. and there is little or no analysis. The application shows evidence of \"bombing\" copying from 9 pts nates without considering relevance. It demonstrates a general lack of understanding of the subject matter and legal principles, with names of parties not included in the guestion. The conclusion is either missing, unsupported by the arguments in the application. contradicts the arguments, or daoes nat address the legal issues, making it irrelevant