Please help!

Mimi is an accountant with the firm Turbot, Zuma & Marshall. She has been working there as an accountant since graduating and obtaining her professional \"chartered accountant\" designation in 2015. Chase is one of the firm's most valued clients. Mimi recently met with Chase to discuss a new business opportunity he is considering. He has been approached by two people who own a cloud computing and data storage website. They have advised him that their asking price is $50 million and he needs to understand whether this is a fair and affordable price. This is a difficult question to answer because it is hard to calculate how much certain intangibles such as goodwill and brand equity are worth and it is also difficult to determine how much web traffic they have and what that is worth. Mimi tells Chase she will do her best to advise him. She then does some research to determine \"best practices\" to be used in assessing the value for such intangibles. She also discusses this with the senior partner at the firm and ultimately, using such best practices and based on her discussion, Mimi advises Chase that while $50 million is too high, $45 million would be fair. On this basis, Chase buys the business. Weeks later, though, he learns that Mimi got it wrong and the value of the business was less than $30 million. The primary reason for the discrepancy relates to some incorrect information provided to Mimi and Chase by the vendors of the business. Briefly analyze this in the context of the second element of negligence discussed in class, and state whether you believe the plaintiff will succeed in proving this second element and why / why not