Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Please help. Thank you. International Case 12-3 Comparison of equity method between IFRS and U.S. GAAP The following are excerpts from the 2015 financial statements

Please help. Thank you.

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

International Case 12-3 Comparison of equity method between IFRS and U.S. GAAP The following are excerpts from the 2015 financial statements of Renault, a large French automobile manufacturer 14- INVESTMENT IN NISSAN A - Nissan consolidation methood Renault's percentage interest in Nissan is 43.7% and Renault holds 43.4% of voting rights in Nissan, Renault and Nissan have chosen to develop a unique type of alliance between two distinct companies with common interests, uniting forces to achieve optimum performance. The Alliance is organized so as to preserve individual brand identities and respect each company's corporate culture. Consequently Renault is not assured of holding the majority of voting rights in Nissan's Shareholders' Meeting. . The terms of the Renault-Nissan agreement do not entitle Renault to appoint the majority of Nissan directors, nor to hold the majority of voting rights at meetings of Nissan's Board of Directors; Renault cannot unilaterally appoint the President of Nissan; on December 31, 2015, Renault occupied two of the nine seats on Nissan's Board of Directors (unchanged since December 31, 2014) Renault-Nissan BV., owned 50% by Renault and 50% by Nissan, is the Alliance's joint decision-making body for strategic issues concerning either group individually. Its decisions are applicable to both Renault and Nissan. This decision-making power was conferred on Renault-Nissan B.V. to generate synergies and bring both automakers worldwide economies of scale. This entity does not enable Renault to direct Nissan's financial and operating strategies, which are governed by Nissan's Board of Directors and cannot therefore be considered to represent contractual control by Renault over Nissan. The matters examined by Renault-Nissan B.V. since it was formed have remained strictly within this contractual framework, and are not an indication that Renault exercises control over Nissan Renault can neither use nor influence the use of Nissan's assets in the same way as its own assets Renault provides no guarantees in respect of Nissan's debt International Case 12-3 Comparison of equity method between IFRS and U.S. GAAP The following are excerpts from the 2015 financial statements of Renault, a large French automobile manufacturer 14- INVESTMENT IN NISSAN A - Nissan consolidation methood Renault's percentage interest in Nissan is 43.7% and Renault holds 43.4% of voting rights in Nissan, Renault and Nissan have chosen to develop a unique type of alliance between two distinct companies with common interests, uniting forces to achieve optimum performance. The Alliance is organized so as to preserve individual brand identities and respect each company's corporate culture. Consequently Renault is not assured of holding the majority of voting rights in Nissan's Shareholders' Meeting. . The terms of the Renault-Nissan agreement do not entitle Renault to appoint the majority of Nissan directors, nor to hold the majority of voting rights at meetings of Nissan's Board of Directors; Renault cannot unilaterally appoint the President of Nissan; on December 31, 2015, Renault occupied two of the nine seats on Nissan's Board of Directors (unchanged since December 31, 2014) Renault-Nissan BV., owned 50% by Renault and 50% by Nissan, is the Alliance's joint decision-making body for strategic issues concerning either group individually. Its decisions are applicable to both Renault and Nissan. This decision-making power was conferred on Renault-Nissan B.V. to generate synergies and bring both automakers worldwide economies of scale. This entity does not enable Renault to direct Nissan's financial and operating strategies, which are governed by Nissan's Board of Directors and cannot therefore be considered to represent contractual control by Renault over Nissan. The matters examined by Renault-Nissan B.V. since it was formed have remained strictly within this contractual framework, and are not an indication that Renault exercises control over Nissan Renault can neither use nor influence the use of Nissan's assets in the same way as its own assets Renault provides no guarantees in respect of Nissan's debt

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Financial Accounting An Integrated Approach

Authors: Michael Gibbins

6th Edition

0176407251, 978-0176407254

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

If f(s) = f (t), then s = t.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

98. For a compound random variable S = N i=1 Xi , find Cov(N, S).

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Define offboarding. Why is it important?

Answered: 1 week ago