Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

please provide justified solution asap to get a upvote...i need these 4 mcqs urgently..just tell me correct options asap..thanks Question Help A friend of yours

please provide justified solution asap to get a upvote...i need these 4 mcqs urgently..just tell me correct options asap..thanks

image text in transcribed
Question Help A friend of yours claims that when he tosses a coin he can control the outcome. You are skeptical and want him to prove it. He tosses the coin, and you call heads, but it's tails. You try again and lose again. Complete parts a through d below. a) Do 2 losses in a row convince you that he really can control the toss? Explain. Choose the correct answer below. O A. No, there is very small chance of losing twice in a row. Such an event is not unusual. O B. No, there is a 25% chance of losing twice in a row. Such an event is not unusual. O C. Yes, there is a very small chance of losing twice in a row. Such an event is very unusual. O D. Yes, there is a 25% chance of losing twice in a row. Such an event is very unusual. b) You try a third time, and again you lose. What's the probability of losing 3 tosses in a row if the process is fair? O A. 0.5 O B. 0.125 O C. 0.25 O D. 0.075 c) Would 3 losses in a row convince you that your friend controls the outcome? Explain. Choose the correct answer below. A. Yes, one expects that to happen 1 time in 8. Such an event is not very unusual. O B. No, one expects that to happen 1 time in 8. Such an event is not very unusual. O C. Yes, one expects that to happen 1 time in 16. Such an event is very unusual. O D. No, one expects that to happen 1 time in 16. Such an event is very unusual. d) How many times in a row would you have to lose to be pretty sure that this friend can really control the toss? Justify your answer by calculating a probability and explaining what it means. Choose the answer below which minimizes the number of losses while still providing a convincing result. O A. Losing 6 times in a row might be convincing evidence. The probability of such an event is only 1 in 128, which seems unusual. O B. Losing 5 times in a row might be convincing evidence. The probability of such an event is only 1 in 32, which seems unusual. O C. Losing 10 times in a row might be convincing evidence. The probability of such an event is only 1 in 512, which seems unusual. O D. Losing 2 times in a row might be convincing evidence. The probability of such an event is only 1 in 2, which seems unusual

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Essential Discrete Mathematics For Computer Science

Authors: Harry Lewis, Rachel Zax

1st Edition

0691190615, 9780691190617

More Books

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions

Question

1. Background knowledge of the subject and

Answered: 1 week ago