PLEASE PROVIDE ME A SHORT AND WEELL EXPLAIN ANSWER OF BOTH CASE STUDIES. THANK YOU.

Case 1

A major organization was facing a crisis when a very senior member of staff was under suspicion of downloading thousands of pornographic images from the internet. He vehemently denied it all, but the case against him looked very serious.

Our detailed and sustained analysis of internet use and traffic pinpointed a clash of IP addresses on the system. The evidence started to point toward the organizations system administrator, but he denied it.

As we dug deeper, we proved that it was the administrator whod been using his local desktop system to access numerous pornographic websites. Over three months, he visited 1200 pornographic websites and downloaded over 15,000 images. To cover his tracks, and in an attempt to frame a senior manager, he had been altering his local system IP address so the trail led to his senior manager colleague.

Q. What are your options for acquiring the image? Write a brief paper specifying the hardware and software you would use.

Case 2

A person has used a stolen vehicle to plant narcotics in a leading industrialists property so as to incriminate him. He is alleged to have killed the owner of the vehicle. Police have partial view of the alleged criminal on CCTV but it is not suitable to be admissible in a court of law.

Through informers, the police later come to know the alleged criminal has tried to destroy his laptop containing the incriminating evidence by throwing his laptop in a lake. With the help of marine divers the police recover the submerged laptop.

Q. Research methods by which an image could perhaps be created of the laptop recovered from the lake that has the evidence. What are the challenges?