Please read the Business analysis below and Upload the continuance of the HPI process by addressing the Performance Analysis - For assistance refer to your independent analysis research and the HPI PowerPoint for guidance.

EXAMPLE: PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS to HOW go about doing what they d The organizational structure of CCC is a "top-down" or corporate model. Under the leadership of the Provost, the Office of Academic and Student Affairs Welcome Payment of Presentation Registration Tuition & Fees is responsible for the execution of the strategic initiatives set by the Chancellor. The Office of Academic and Student Affairs has jurisdiction over both the Residency Advising Purchasing Offices of Advising and Student Success and Enrollment Management. Verification Textbooks CCC is an open-enrollment institution that has an annual admissions process. Obtaining The admissions process consists of two stages: application and new student Campus Tour Placement Testing Student ID orientation. Scheduling of new student orientation is done through Eventbrite (Admissions). The new student orientation may be conducted by the Office of Admissions or by the College Advising Office. The following is an outline of flow chart for the New Student Orientation Checklist: PROFESSOR ALTA WILLIAMS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CONTINUEDD The admissions process is designed to be completed over a two-day process. After completing an admissions application, students are issued an ID number, and IT credentials to complete the next steps in the admissions process. New student orientation scheduling opens before the registration cycle starts each semester. The new student orientation has a two-hour time allotment for the presentation and registration. The new student orientation presentation is a two-part sequence. The first half of presentation consists of an overview of the CCC academic programming, institutional policies, and student support services (New Student Orientation). The second part of the presentation consists of providing students with an overview of navigating the student portal, which culminates in students completing self-registration, assisted by the presenters. PROFESSOR ALTA WILLIAMS SO FAR. .. The first thing you've done in the first submission of the BUSINESS ANALYSIS was IDENTIFIED A REAL-LIFE EXPERIENCE within an organization or business; and 2 . THOUGHT OF A PERFORMANCE ISSUE that hinders the operation 3. Before any writing begun, you CONDUCTED RESEARCH VIA THE INTERNET ON HUMAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT: BUSINESS ANALYSIS to understand the scope of the content that is to be provided in the reporting phase of the Business Analysis. The next thing you've done in this second submission of the PERFORMANCE ANAYLSIS is 4. REVIEWED everything the Business Analysis stated the business is; in order to PROFESSOR ALTA WILLIAMSHP] Business Analysis 1 The ABC Community Center offers a venue for athletes to sharpen and enhance their talents. However, poor event scheduling has created interruptions in athletes' training and competition preparation. This problem has been shown to result in distracted athletes, decreasing attendance at events, and a deterioration in performance quality. The ABC Community Center's management team must address this issue by conducting a thorough investigation into the core cause ofthe problem and identifying remedies that will enhance the event booking process. This essay will assess the problems and provide suggestions to enhance the event scheduling process using HPI (Human Performance Improvement) approaches. Business Analysis: Doing a business analysis is the first step toward fixing the problem. This analysis's goal is to determine the scale of the problem, the parties involved, and the effect of the issue on company operations (Arrington ct al. 2023). The business analysis will inform the management team about the scope of the issue and act as the basis for selecting and executing solutions. In the instance ofthe ABC Community Center. the purpose is to offer members ofthe community with high-quality sports activities and services. Inadequate event scheduling has a direct inuence on this aim by causing disagreements and misunderstanding among players. coaches. and staff. The ABC Community Center has suffered a number of negative repercussions as a result of poor event scheduling. For starters, the athletes' training and preparation have suffered, resulting in poor competition performance. Second, disengaged athletes have resulted in a decrease in event attendance. which has resulted in a loss ot'money. Ultimately. the detrimental inuence on athletes' performance and decreased attendance at events has harmed the ABC Community Center's image. To solve this problem, the management team must do a stakeholder analysis in order to identify the main players in the event scheduling process. Coaches, players, event organizers, and administrators are examples ofstakeholders. The management team should solicit input from stakeholders in order to comprehend their points ofview and nd opportunities for improvement in the event scheduling process. 3 of 7 To overcome this problem, the business may want to think about creating a more disciplined scheduling approach. This might include establishing a centralized scheduling system in which all events and activities are coordinated and arranged ahead of time. Moreover, the organization should think about employing a specialized event planner to manage the scheduling process and ensure that all events are properly scheduled and communicated to athletes and staff. Performance Analysis: The performance analysis is the next phase in the HPI process. The goal of this study is to discover the performance gap, or the difference between desired and present performance (Saad et al. 2022). The intended performance in this scenario is efficient event scheduling that matches the demands of the athletes and assures their best competitive preparation. Yet, present performance is deficient, with severe effects for the athletes and the ABC Community Center. The management team must review the present event scheduling process and suggest areas for improvement in order to discover the performance gap. This assessment might entail assessing the present scheduling process, detecting bottlenecks, and analyzing the communication routes between the process's stakeholders. The management team might also solicit input from athletes and coaches in order to identify pain spots and places where the event scheduling process could be improved. After identifying the performance gap, the management team must determine the fundamental cause of the problem. Some potential underlying reasons might be a lack of coordination between the many teams working on the event scheduling process, insufficient resources, or poor communication routes between the stakeholders. One cause for the performance disparity might be a breakdown in communication among athletes, coaches, and the scheduling crew. It is critical to get input from all stakeholders in order to understand their requirements and preferences. Another possibility is that the scheduling crew lacks experience coordinating events and competitions. It is critical to ensure that the team has the required skills and resources to efficiently organize activities. Cause Analysis: A cause analysis is the third phase in the HPI process. The goal of this study is to determine the root reasons of the performance discrepancy. The underlying cause of the problem will be determined by the cause analysis, which will influence the creation of remedies toenhance the event scheduling process. The scheduling issue might have various reasons. One possible explanation is the absence ofa centralized scheduling system. Several scheduling technologies, such as spreadsheets and calendars, may be used by the center, which may lead to confusion and mistakes. A single scheduling system that is available to all stakeholders and can give real-time updates is critical. Another possible source ofthe scheduling issue is a lack ofa prioritizing mechanism. The scheduling statf may schedule events based on availability rather than prioritizing activities that match the athletes' demands Prioritization must take into account elements such as athlete preferences, talent levels, and competition dates. The management team must employ a range of tools and methodologies to undertake a cause analysis, such as the Fishbone diagram, the Five Whys, or the lshikawa diagram. These tools may assist the management team in identifying potentiai sources ofthe problem and determining the most probable root cause. For example, ifthe main cause ofthe problem is insufcient communication channels between stakeholders, the management team might devise solutions to strengthen communication channels and guarantee that all stakeholders are informed and participating in the event scheduiing process. Solution Analysis: The solution analysis is the next phase in the HP] process. The goal ofthis study is to discover and create solutions that address the issue's core cause. Long-term solutions must be realistic, effective, and sustainable. The management team might convene brainstorming meetings with stakeholders engaged in the event scheduling process to develop solutions. These meetings might include a discussion of the present event scheduling process's pain points and issues, as well as brainstorming suggestions for change. The management team might also do research on best practices in event scheduling and apply this knowledge to the context of the ABC Community Center. Implementing a centralized scheduling system that allows ail stakeholders to access the schedule, improving communication channels between stakeholders, ensuring adequate resources are available for event scheduling, and conducting regular feedback sessions with athletes and coaches to ensure that their needs are met are some possible solutions to improve the event scheduling process. Intervention Analysis: The last stage is to create an intervention analysis that details the proposed solutions as well as the activities necessary to put these ideas into action. The intervention analysis should contain a timeframe, budget, and the stakeholders who will be accountable for putting the ideas into action (Arrington et al. 2022). For example, ifthe identified solution is to build a centralized scheduling system, the intervention analysis should detail the procedures needed to choose and deploy the system. This Wis, identifying suitable suppliers, conducting a cost-benefit analysis, choosing the best vendor, designing a training plan for stakeholders, and executing a pilot test to conrm the system is functional. The center should invest in a scheduling system that delivers realtime updates and is available to all stakeholders. This may eliminate mistakes and misunderstanding while also ensuring that all stakeholders are on the same page. The scheduling staff should create a prioritizing system that takes athlete preferences, skill levels, and competition deadlines into account. This may assist guarantee that activities are arranged based on the athletes' demands rather than availability. To acquire input on the scheduling process, the center should have frequent feedback meetings with athletes, coaches, and the scheduling crew. This may aid in identifying areas for improvement as well as ensuring that the scheduling process meets the demands ol'all stakeholders. The center should train the scheduling staff to ensure that they have the required skills and resources to efciently arrange activities. This may assist to enhance the scheduling process's quality and eliminate mistakes and confusion. The center should create a communication strategy to keep all stakeholders aware about future events and scheduling changes. This may assist to avoid misunderstanding and prepare athletes and coaches for forthcoming competitions. Conclusion The absence of appropriate event scheduling for ABC Community Center athletes has had a detrimental impact on both the athletes and the center. HPI methodologies may be used to examine the problem and provide solutions to enhance the event scheduling process. The extent of the issue and the parties involved are identified by the business analysis, while the performance gap is identied by the performance analysis. The cause analysis determines the underlying source of the problem, while the solution analysis otters potential remedies to the problem. The intervention analysis details the measures needed to put the proposed solutions into action. The ABC Community Center's management team can enhance the event scheduling process and guarantee that the athletes get the assistance they need to perform at their best by employing HPI approaches. LET'S REVIEW... After you've researched and understood the Business Analysis Performance Analysis Gap Analysis Cause Analysis Knowledge Intervention In this exact order you will begin to start your written articulation, per each analysis PROFESSOR ALTA WILLIAMS PROVIDING THE PERFORMANCE... In the PA stage you DO NOT PROVIDE YOUR PERSONAL INSIGHT, CONTINUE TO LISTEN THROUGH OBSERVATION and take note ONLY on how things are actually done in order to report the actual performances/operations PROFESSOR ALTA WILLIAMS WRITING THE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS is linking it to the job. Notice the title "Performance" this is like the OBSERVATION stage, in which you continue to document what you've observed in order to compare and contrast the difference of WHAT THEY SAY THEY DO AND WHAT THEY ACTUALLY DO in order to lead into the next stage, the Gap Analysis. In the next analysis you will report the COMPARISON and CONTRAST of the Business and Performance Analysis that would result in the GAP between the two perspectives/analysis reports. PROFESSOR ALTA WILLIAMSSUBMISSION WEEK... A full HPI Plan is inclusive of all (5) analysis, which includes the HPI overview/introduction and concludes with the KNOWLEDGE INTERVENTION For clarity, the following is submitted in this order: HPIssue/Introduction and Business Analysis (week 14) Performance Analysis (week 12) Include the researched references that you conducted on the Performance Analysis with the prior listing from the Business Analysis citation references on the last page. PROFESSOR ALTA WILLIAMS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OVERVIEWEMENT