Please read the following excerpt from

A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster

closely. Then answer the question.

As the foregoing discussion shows, the language of Section

1008 cannot be read to encompass the activities of Napster's

users. But even if Section 1008 did apply to Napster's users, it

would not provide Napster itself with a defense to liability for

contributory or vicarious infringement. That is because the

terms of Section 1008 address only whether consumers can be

sued for infringement; nothing in Section 1008 addresses or

changes whether they are engaged in infringement.

True or False: Existing sections of the law neither encompass the activities of

Napster's users nor address whether they are engaged in copyright

infringement, and therefore Napster cannot be show to be liable for

contributory infringement.