Please read the R v Jackson decision. I realize that it is long, but please at the very least read the following paragraphs: 1-32, 40-60, 75-80, 95 - 101,115-176.

2. The question is not about whether you agree or disagree with the ultimate sentence (although you are welcome to share those opinions, too), but what you think about Judge Nakatsuru's analysis and particularly why he considered systemic factors relevant and how he used information on systemic factors to determine the sentence.