Please respond to the following case scenarios using legal terminology and without doing any google research.

1. In the case,Agis v. Howard Johnson Co., the Howard Johnson manager called a meting of the waitresses, including Ms. Agis. He said, " there was some stealing going on" and that until the identity of the thief was made known, he would start firing the waitresses in alphabetical order.The plaintiff, Ms. Agis, has the misfortune of being first to be fired.She filed a complaint alleging that she was greatly upset and crying.Do you think Ms. Agis has a claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?

2.A grocery store entered a float in a parade.As thefloat traveled down the street, employees threw candy to the crowd. Children running to collect the candy injured a spectator.Argue why or why not the spectator should be allowed to sue the grocery store using terms and elements of tort.

3.A 15 year old threw a rock off a bridge overpass.The rock went through the windshieldof the car Barbara Collins was driving.She suffered a severe brain injury and sued the manufacturer of the car under a theory of strict liability for a defective windshield.The car manufacturer argued that the 15 year old's conduct should relieve them from liability. Using theories of strict liability, product liability and torts discuss this case.