Please review the summaries of these three cases:

United States v. Jones https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-1259

Katz v. United States https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/35

Carroll v. United States https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/267/132/

1. Is it a reasonable progression based on the Court's analysis to require a warrant before the government places a GPS on a vehicle? Why or why not?
2. Based on the Court's interpretation of the right to privacy under the 4th Amendment, should a warrant be required to place a GPS? Why or why not?
3. Assuming that a warrant is required, what are the exceptions to this requirement that might apply when the government legally places a GPS on a vehicle?