Please solve it for me

Question 2 (1 point) In 2008 George Plough fell into some serious financial difficulties after becoming the victim of "identity fraud." His chequing account, with a balance of approximately $4,500 at the beginning of April of that year, was virtually wiped out in a couple of weeks by fraud artists who had acquired his PIN number. In the meantime, Plough had purchased some merchandise from Excalibur Furniture Mart on April 27 for the amount of $889.97, which he paid for by personal cheque. After the cheque "bounced," Excalibur engaged in a couple of weeks of discussions with Plough, but the manager essentially came to the conclusion that Plough was, in her words, a "fraud artist." She had a notice posted on the cash register to its two stores in the city advising employees "...not to accept any more cheques from George Plough". The notice was large enough that other customers saw the it on the tills when they were paying for their merchandise. One of these customers was Plough's next door neighbour. The neighbour told Plough about the matter and he was extremely embarrassed. By the second week of May the identity fraud was confirmed and it was even reported in the newspapers. Of course, no criminal charges for fraud were ever laid against Plough. It took another week after the newspaper reports before Excalibur took down the sign on its cash registers. Plough was very upset. 3. Reasoning: Here you will talk about what argument the plaintiff must make to support their case, what are the elements of the tort and what facts do they have to support those elements. Also consider what possible defences they may have come up against. 4. What is the risk management that either party can take in the future? i.e. what can they do differently to avoid this type of lawsuit