Please spend a couple of minutes watching the following video featuring David Suzuki talking about what he sees as the problems of economics:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQGHJa4Im4A

Considering the materials this week that discuss the differences between anthropocentrism and the idea of the intrinsic value of nature, which view would support an economic view of nature? Which view of nature do you believe Suzuki would support?

Why does Suzuki believe that economics is NOT a science?

Please add any other thoughts or reflections on this video in relation to the course materials this week, and what you think about the idea that nature has intrinsic value.

Your post should be approximately 150 word in length and should be edited and organized. Please also respond to one other person in the discussion area.