please state the decision and the reason.

PO POD) 2. On January 15, Jorge, purchased a small Matisse oil painting from a fine arts gallery in Manhattan for $3 million, relying on the gallery owner's representation that the painting was a genuine Matisse. The gallery is known as one of the top art dealers in the world specializing in Matisse paintings and regularly sells paintings to collectors and museums. The purchase price of $3 million is to be paid in six installments. After paying two installments on the purchase price, Jorge had the painting appraised by an expert. He learned to his astonishment that the painting was not a genuine Matisse, but rather a cheap imitation worth $2,000 at most. As a result, he refused to pay the remaining four installments on the purchase price. The gallery owner sued for breach of contract. What defense can Jorge raise in the lawsuit filed by the gallery? Judgment for whom? (25 points)