please submit answers in the form of a NICELY FORMATTED GRAPH that containsa figure caption, which indicates the following information:

1. Whether or not you accept the hypothesis.

2. Whether the differences in your "treatment" groups are statistically different from one another (using the formatting style from the lecture.)

3. What statistical test you used to analyze the raw data (t-test, ANOVA, etc.).

4. What p-value you used to determine significance

Example of the Nicely formatted data table

Example Table RAW DATA: Number of migrated cells per square mm 24 hours Sample Number Collagen Nanofiber (24 Collagen Gel (24 Fibrin (24 145 21 101 2 134 17 123 3 165 32 175 155 21 143 131 31 124 6 145 38 166 163 39 123 8 129 35 143 AVERAG 145.875 29.25 137.2 SD 14.0959720 8.46421036 24.5342326 Reported 146 29 137 Reported SD 14 25Example Figure 180 160 140 120 Number Migrated Cells per mm^2 8 8 8 8 Collagen Collagen Gel Fibrin Gel Nanofiber Figure 1: Number of migrating cells after 24 hours. The number of cells that migrated through the collagen nanofiber construct at 24 hours was 146 + 14 cells / mm2. This is significantly greater than the negative control group, collagen gel, which had 29 + 14 cells / mm2 , and similar to positive control group, fibrin gel, which had 137+ 28 cells / mm2. The difference is statistically significant per an ANOVA (one way, p-value = 0.0043) and a multiple comparisons test. Therefore, we accept the hypothesis that the collagen nanofiber stimulates cell migration (Data as mean + standard deviation, * = p