Please take your time to paraphrase the paragraphs below carefully! These paragraphs relate to "Lab 1: Uncertainty of Measurement" in PCS211.

Upon completion of the uncertainty lab, there are many factors to consider and place into recognition. According to the results, the density of the unknown material given is closest to the density of aluminum in measuring the volume through a metre stick. However, the results from measuring the volume of the unknown material through the vernier callipers lead to a result closest to titanium on the appendix. Lastly, the final method of calculating the volume through a graduated cylinder displays a similar result to acrylic in the appendix. The percent error calculated for the metre stick method relating to the appendix value of aluminum is 25.93%. Furthermore, the percent error calculated for the vernier callipers method relating to the appendix value of the titanium is 8.89%. Additionally, the percent error calculated for the graduated cylinder method relating to the appendix value of the acrylic is 8.57%. The following outcomes demonstrate that the results lead to three different materials in the appendix and three percentage errors. Each instrument of measurement will have its own uncertainty to accommodate an).r mismeasurenients, another factor worth mentioning. According to our knowledge, to find the uncertainty in the measurement instruments, we take the most precise certain place holding value in the instrument and divide it by two to find the uncertainty in the measurement