Please watch this brief clip of Alan Shore vs Supreme Court (BostonLegal) Part 2/3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01yZZuXIwbA To be clear, this is a terrible oral argument, and it would never, ever, ever happen this way in any court anywhere ever. But, accepting the over-the-top theatrics at face value, does "Alan Shore" (played by James Spader) have a point about the status and reputation of the current Supreme Court?

If so, does that impact the perceived legitimacy of the Supreme Court, including as it rules on important cases with national security implications? (a well explained short answer please) Note: I need help answering the above questions based on the clip of Alan Shore vs Supreme Court (Boston Legal) Part 2/3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01yZZuXIwbA