plz helpp

What is one significant difference between the Kyoto protocol and the Paris agreement? The Kyoto protocol proposed to limit the global temperature increase to below 2, but the Paris agreement set the more ambitious goal of limiting it to 1.5 . The Kyoto protocol allowed countries to set their own goals, whereas the Paris agreement assigned goals to the countries in question. The Kyoto protocol was interested in bringing CO2 levels back to the level they were at in 2000, but the Paris agreement proposed instead bringing them back to 2015 levels. The Kyoto protocol trusted the expertise of the IPCC but the Paris agreement replaced the IPCC findings with the IPNC report. If global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are increasing and ice on both the land and sea is decreasing, we can infer that global atmospheric temperatures are cycling between increasing and decreasing staying the same steadily increasing steadily decreasing What is the advantage of an energy use per revenue dollar measure rather than merely measuring the gross amount of energy usage within a company? Measuring only the gross amount of energy usage is unfair to large companies who are being compared to small companies. If a gross amount of energy measure is used, it is not clear which parts of an organization are wasting energy, but energy use per revenue dollar gives that level of specificity. Energy use per revenue dollar takes into account whether a company is growing or shrinking. Using the energy use per revenue dollar factors in whether a company is creating jobs and wealth, which should reduce their required environmental stewardship