Pollution Prevention, P2 Investment

Heaps Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Heaps uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly.

Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality. The closed-loop system would produce only four pounds of sludge, and the sludge would be virtually pure metal, with significant market value. The system requires an investment of $628,600 and will cost $45,410 in increased annual operation plus an annual purchase of $7,720 of filtration medium. However, management projects the following savings:

Water usage	$	67,340
Chemical usage		42,490
Sludge disposal		90,120
Recovered metal sales		45,500
Sampling of discharge		120,840
Total	$	366,290

The equipment qualifies as a seven-year MACRS asset. Management has decided to use straight-line depreciation for tax purposes, using the required half-year convention. The tax rate is 40 percent. The projected life of the system is 10 years. The hurdle rate is 16 percent for all capital budgeting projects, although the companys cost of capital is 12 percent.

The present value tables provided in Exhibit 19B.1 and Exhibit 19B.2 must be used to solve the following problems.

Required:

Hide

1. Based on the financial data provided, prepare a schedule of expected cash flows. Enter cash outflows as negative amounts and cash inflows as positive amounts.

Heaps Company

Schedule of Expected Cash Flow

Year 0

$

Year 1:

Operating costs

$

Savings

Depreciation shield

Total

$

Years 27:

Operating costs

$

Savings

Depreciation shield

Total

$

Year 8:

Operating costs

$

Savings

Depreciation shield

Total

$

Years 910:

Operating costs

$

Savings

Total

$

2. What is the payback period? Round your answer to two decimal places. years

3. Calculate the NPV of the closed-loop system. Round intermediate calculations and the final answer to the nearest dollar. $

Should the company invest in the system? - Select your answer -YesNoCorrect 3 of Item 2

4. The calculation in Requirement 3 ignored several factors that could affect the projects viability: savings from avoiding the annual fines, positive effect on sales due to favorable environmental publicity, increased plating quality from the new system, and the avoidance of the lawsuit. Can these factors be quantified? - Select your answer -YesNoCorrect 4 of Item 2

If so, should they have been included in the analysis? - Select your answer -YesNoCorrect 5 of Item 2

Suppose, for example, that the annual fines being incurred are $75,290, the sales effect is $59,770 per year, the quality effect is not estimable, and cancellation of the lawsuit because of the new system would avoid an expected settlement at the end of Year 3 (including legal fees) of $307,200. Assuming these are all after-tax amounts, what effect would their inclusion have on the payback period? On the NPV? Round payback to two decimal places and round NPV calculation and final answer to the nearest dollar.

Payback	- Select your answer -IncreasesDecreasesCorrect 6 of Item 2	by		years
NPV	- Select your answer -IncreasesDecreasesCorrect 8 of Item 2	by	$