POSITION: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) should not be available for anyone under any circumstances, the law should revert to a blanket prohibition on assisted suicide. COMPOUND QUESTIONS: Why should MAID not be available for anyone under any circumstances? How are autonomy, paternalism (focus on particular types), quality of life, sanctity of life, and wrongness of killing perspectives relevant and significant? For chosen position: DEVELOP SUPPORT: Which specific philosophical principles and theories provide persuasive and meaningful support for your position, and how do they support that position, i.e., which particular interpretations and applications of those principles and theories, and why? DRAW CONNECTIONS to REASONING of Judges: Which passages or portions of the reasoning of the judges in the case(s) provide support for the position you are arguing for, and how do they support that position, i.e., which specific arguments of the judges are relevant to your arguments and why? [Rodriguez v. Attorney General of B.C. and Carter v. Canada] ADDRESS CRITICISMS and OBJECTIONS: What are meaningful and impactful criticisms and objections to the position you are defending? How can you best respond to those criticisms and objections in order to persuasively and decisively defend your position?