Preliminary In our analysis of Ch.10, we studied the aggregate demand (AD) and aggregate supply (AS) model in the context of recessions, expansions and supply shocks on economic activity. In addition, in Ch.12, we discussed the role of monetary policy on economic activity. As a result, the different type of 'shocks' that affect economic activity bare consequences on the level of inflation and output. Central banks, such as the RBA, can simultaneously pursue "stabilising prices" (i.e., maintaining a targeted level of inflation) and "stabilising economic activity" (i.e., economic activity remaining at its potential level). However, not all shocks to the economy are equal. In response to this, economists/policymakers can either achieve price stability or economic stability, but not both. This trade-off ultimately poses a dilemma for central banks with dual mandates such as price stability and economic activity. On the other hand, New-Keynesian theory suggests that there is no trade-off between price stability and maintaining economic activity - something called the "divine coincidence". Recall the long-run potential macroeconomic equilibrium condition: Inflation LRAS Rate, AS, AD. Aggregate Output, Y Fig. 1 - Macro-equilibrium price and output in the long-run. where the economy is at long-run macroeconomic equilibrium (point 1); output (or real GDP) is at its potential level at YP; and inflation (or the price level) is at its target rate (set by the central bank) at IT.Oil price shocks have been a reoccurring phenomenon over the last fty years, causing signicant uctuations in the price of oil. Examples of oil price shocks include the early 19705 caused by the OPEC oil embargo, the early 19905 caused by the Gulf War, and the Arab Spring during the eady 2010s Oil-importing nations like Australia are signicantly affected by rising oil prices. Nonetheless, evidence has shown that oil price shocks are a temporary phenomenon, and eventually, prices decline. Assume that there is no scal policy response from the government in relation to an oil price shock. Use Fig.1 as your starting point. a. Explain and illustrate the short-run effect of a temporary oil price shock on macroeconomic equilibrium using the ADAS model. [3 marks]. 1:. Explain and illustrate the adjustment process back to long-run equilibrium based on the following: i. Self-correcting mechanism (i.e.. with no policy response). [2 marks] ii. Active stabilisation response (i.e., with policy response). Note, there are TWO active stabilisation polices here. Explain both. [4 marks] c. Based on your answers in part (b), does the 'divine coincidence' hold? [1 mark]