Pretraining Posttraining var var va 1 40.00 2 3 20.00 26.00 15.00 4 23.00 5 6 33.00 7 32.00 8 9 10 11 Employee ID 100.00 102.00 103.00 104.00 105.00 106.00 107.00 108.00 109.00 110.00 111.00 112.00 113.00 114.00 115.00 116.00 117.00 118.00 119.00 120.00 121.00 122.00 42.00 22.00 30.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 46.00 48.00 40.00 41.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 28.00 45.00 33.00 45.00 30.00 22.00 36.00 12 13 14 34.00 23.00 26.00 27.00 48.00 42.00 50.00 22.00 30.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 26.00 29.00 30.00 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Employee Pretraining ID Posttraining var var HVV U.VN vu v 18 35.00 33.00 40.00 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 118.00 119.00 120.00 121.00 122.00 123.00 124.00 125.00 126.00 127.00 128.00 129.00 130.00 131.00 132.00 133.00 134.00 135.00 136.00 137.00 138.00 26.00 29.00 30.00 32.00 36.00 45.00 42.00 20.00 16.00 48.00 44.00 48.00 12.00 30.00 36.00 37.00 43.00 20.00 31.00 45.00 30.00 22.00 36.00 42.00 48.00 45.00 40.00 28.00 18.00 48.00 43.00 49.00 21.00 33.00 45.00 37.00 41.00 23.00 38.00 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Question 3 Dataset: Project 3 Q3 data.say Imagine you were a job candidate trying to pitch your skills to a potential employer. Would you be more likely to get the job after giving a short speech describing your skills, or after writing a short speech and having a potential employer read those words? Two psychologists wanted to know whether a person's speech (i.e., vocal tone, cadence, and pitch) communicates information about their intellect better or worse than their written words (even if they are the same words as in the speech) The psychologists randomly assigned 39 professional recruiters for Fortune 500 companies to one of two conditions. In the audio condition, recruiters listened to audio recordings of a job candidate's spoken job pitch. In the transcript condition, recruiters read a transcription of the job candidate's pitch. After hearing or reading the pitch, the recruiters rated the job candidate's intellect, with higher scores indicating the recruiters rated the candidate as higher in intellect. The recruiters also rated their overall impression of the job candidate (higher score indicating greater overall impression). Finally, the recruiters indicated how likely they would be to recommend hiring the job candidate (0 - not at all likely, 10 - extremely likely). 1) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the Intellect. Rating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output. (4 pts) 2) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the Impression Rating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output. (4 pts) candidate s pitch. After hearing or reading the pitch the recruiters rated the job candidate's intellect, with higher scores indicating the recruiters rated the candidate as higher in intellect. The recruiters also rated their overall impression of the job candidate (higher score indicating greater overall impression). Finally, the recruiters indicated how likely they would be to recommend hiring the job candidate (0 - not at all likely, 10 - extremely likely). 1) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the IntellectRating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output. (4 pts) 2) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the Impression Rating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output (4 pts) 3) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the Hire Rating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output (4 pts) 4) Prepare an APA-style results paragraph describing the results of the analyses performed above. (12 pts) Hint: You need to first identif what type of test you need to perform. The 30 recruiters were randomly assigned to either the transcript condition (coded as 0) or the audio condition (coded as 1)which means that we are basically comparing the means of two independent groups. Pretraining Posttraining var var va 1 40.00 2 3 20.00 26.00 15.00 4 23.00 5 6 33.00 7 32.00 8 9 10 11 Employee ID 100.00 102.00 103.00 104.00 105.00 106.00 107.00 108.00 109.00 110.00 111.00 112.00 113.00 114.00 115.00 116.00 117.00 118.00 119.00 120.00 121.00 122.00 42.00 22.00 30.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 46.00 48.00 40.00 41.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 28.00 45.00 33.00 45.00 30.00 22.00 36.00 12 13 14 34.00 23.00 26.00 27.00 48.00 42.00 50.00 22.00 30.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 26.00 29.00 30.00 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Employee Pretraining ID Posttraining var var HVV U.VN vu v 18 35.00 33.00 40.00 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 118.00 119.00 120.00 121.00 122.00 123.00 124.00 125.00 126.00 127.00 128.00 129.00 130.00 131.00 132.00 133.00 134.00 135.00 136.00 137.00 138.00 26.00 29.00 30.00 32.00 36.00 45.00 42.00 20.00 16.00 48.00 44.00 48.00 12.00 30.00 36.00 37.00 43.00 20.00 31.00 45.00 30.00 22.00 36.00 42.00 48.00 45.00 40.00 28.00 18.00 48.00 43.00 49.00 21.00 33.00 45.00 37.00 41.00 23.00 38.00 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Question 3 Dataset: Project 3 Q3 data.say Imagine you were a job candidate trying to pitch your skills to a potential employer. Would you be more likely to get the job after giving a short speech describing your skills, or after writing a short speech and having a potential employer read those words? Two psychologists wanted to know whether a person's speech (i.e., vocal tone, cadence, and pitch) communicates information about their intellect better or worse than their written words (even if they are the same words as in the speech) The psychologists randomly assigned 39 professional recruiters for Fortune 500 companies to one of two conditions. In the audio condition, recruiters listened to audio recordings of a job candidate's spoken job pitch. In the transcript condition, recruiters read a transcription of the job candidate's pitch. After hearing or reading the pitch, the recruiters rated the job candidate's intellect, with higher scores indicating the recruiters rated the candidate as higher in intellect. The recruiters also rated their overall impression of the job candidate (higher score indicating greater overall impression). Finally, the recruiters indicated how likely they would be to recommend hiring the job candidate (0 - not at all likely, 10 - extremely likely). 1) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the Intellect. Rating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output. (4 pts) 2) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the Impression Rating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output. (4 pts) candidate s pitch. After hearing or reading the pitch the recruiters rated the job candidate's intellect, with higher scores indicating the recruiters rated the candidate as higher in intellect. The recruiters also rated their overall impression of the job candidate (higher score indicating greater overall impression). Finally, the recruiters indicated how likely they would be to recommend hiring the job candidate (0 - not at all likely, 10 - extremely likely). 1) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the IntellectRating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output. (4 pts) 2) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the Impression Rating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output (4 pts) 3) Please perform the appropriate procedure in SPSS compare participants in the audio condition to participants in the transcript condition on the Hire Rating variable. a) What is your null hypothesis? What is your research hypothesis? (2 pts) b) Attach the SPSS output (4 pts) 4) Prepare an APA-style results paragraph describing the results of the analyses performed above. (12 pts) Hint: You need to first identif what type of test you need to perform. The 30 recruiters were randomly assigned to either the transcript condition (coded as 0) or the audio condition (coded as 1)which means that we are basically comparing the means of two independent groups