Priscilla Ceballos's $6-$year$-$old daughter is a fan of Hannah Montana and wanted to go to a Hannah Montana concert. A radio station was offering two tickets to the Hannah Montann concert for the child who wrote the winning essay. Ms$.$ Ceballos and her daughter wrote an essay that detailed an account of their husband$/$father dying in the war on Iraq$-$ The problem was that their husband$/$father was not in Iraq and certainly not dead. When the fake essay was uncovered, Ms$.$ Ceballos said, $"$We did the essay, and that's what we did to win. $..$ We did whatever we could to win." The company revoked the prize and the award of the tickets.

Suppose the contest rules did not spell out that the essay had to be based on true and verifiable facts. What could the radio station rely on in revoking the prize and still have public support for its decision?

The Blanchard$/$Peale test for ethical dilemmas

Normative standards

Stakeholder analysis

None of the above