Problem: Authorized agents of Boohoo company and Canadian Beauty (a beauty supply

business based in Montreal, Canada) discussed a potential sale during several

telephone calls, text, and emails. Boohoo's agent sent a sample of the

product. The agents of Boohoo and of the Canadian Beauty company exchanged phone calls about

the product shipment. The two businesses covered the description of the

products. Boohoo sent a sample of the product. After two

weeks of back and forth, the agents decided the quantity, price, and delivery

terms. Resources promised to ship the product from New York no later than

April 1st. There was no Purchase Order from the Canadian business.

The agents presented their discussions to their principals during the second week

of February. The President of Canadian Beauty said to its agent "Great" and

"Thank you". Then she sent a message to Boohoo saying she was particularly interested in its Articles 4.3 and 11. However, boohoo did not reply, thinking an agreement had been formed by the agents without

those two clauses, which the company did not want.. Boohoo shipped the product from New York by a truck on March 1st.

The Canadian company has the Shea butter in its warehouse but has not paid.

_________________

My question: I am having trouble deciding whether a contract for sale has been made. I am not sure whether I should start from the UCC 2-204 or whether there is a UCC 2-2-7 issue. Was there a contract for sale of the product? if so how should I go about proving this?