Project: Follow the steps below to write a case brief (aka legal brief) on one of the 2 cases identified below.

Step 1: Read the article on how to make a case brief at:

https://www.quimbee.com/resources/how-to-write-a-case-briefLinks to an external site.

Step 2: Pick ONE of the following cases:

Wilson v Donze

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort WorthJun 26, 1985692 S.W.2d 734 (Tex. App. 1985) No. 2-84-243-CV. June 26, 1985. Appeal from the 342nd District Court, Tarrant County, Joe Bruce Cunningham, J. Bagby, Ross, Arnn Hartley and Deborah K. Hartley, Arlington, for appellant. Jones Parks Huffman and B. Scott Huffman and Daniel E. Blumberg, Arlington, for appellees. Before JORDAN, ASHWORTH and HOPKINS, JJ.

Project Minimum Requirements:

Your document should follow the outline provided below:

Source: https://www.quimbee.com/resources/how-to-write-a-case-briefLinks to an external site.

• Case Style and Info:
  • Case Name
  • Which Court?
  • Who are the Parties
  • Original Plaintiff
  • Original Defendant
  • Who is appealing?
• Facts of the Case
• the cause of action (g., a suit for replevin, breach of contract, and so forth),
• an identification of the plaintiff and the defendant in the case by party name,
• the operative facts of the case that led to the dispute between the parties,
• the trial court/jury's holding, and
• the appellate court's holding.
• Legal Issue(s)
• Clearly identify the Legal Issue(s) in question
• Identify any Real Estate Agency Legal Issues
• Rule of Law
• What rule of law did the court base its decision on?
• Holding and Reasoning
• A "yes" or "no" answer to the question posed by the issue section,
• The relevant legal principles and rules used to decide the case,
• The application of those principles to the facts of the case,
• The court's conclusion,
• The procedural disposition (g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.), and
• The names of any seminal cases or important statutes used by the majority in its opinion.
• Concurrences and Dissents
• Concurrences
  • Reasoning
• Dissents
  • Reasoning

Will you be specific on each bullet? specifically on the holding/reasoning and the concurrences and dissents.