Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Project Lefty costs $150,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $33,000 per year for 6 years. If the company's WACC is 6%, what

Project Lefty costs $150,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $33,000 per year for 6 years. If the company's WACC is 6%, what is the project's internal rate of return (IRR)? 6.72% 7.15% 8.56% 10.55% 13.46% Project Leopard costs $90,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $21,000 per year for 6 years. If the company's WACC is 5%, what is the project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR)? 5.51% 6.75% 7.40% 8.00% 10.42%

QUESTION 4 Project Leonardo costs $125,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $26,000 per year for 6 years. If the company's WACC is 4%, what is the project's payback period? 3.95 years 4.29 years 4.55 years 4.81 years 5.42 years

QUESTION 5 Project Leopard costs $90,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $21,000 per year for 6 years. If the company's WACC is 5%, what is the project's discounted payback period? 4.42 years 4.79 years 4.94 years 5.45 years 5.60 years

QUESTION 6 Your division is considering two projects with the following cash flows. Project A costs $225 million and has cash flows of $130 million in year 1, $100 million in year 2, and $75 million in year 3. Project B costs $160 million and has cash flows of $95 million in year 1, $75 million in year 2, and $60 million in year 3. What is Project A's net present value if the WACC is 5%? $39.77 million $48.95 million $54.30 million $58.78 million $71.25 million

QUESTION 7 Your division is considering two projects with the following cash flows. Project A costs $120 million and has cash flows of $85 million in year 1, $65 million in year 2, and $45 million in year 3. Project B costs $200 million and has cash flows of $120 million in year 1, $100 million in year 2, and $80 million in year 3. By how much would Project B's net present value change if the WACC increased from 5% to 10%? NPV would decrease by $16.91 million NPV would decrease by $17.21 million NPV would decrease by $19.02 million NPV would decrease by $22.25 million NPV would decrease by $32.18 million

QUESTION 8 Your division is considering two projects with the following cash flows. Project A costs $120 million and has cash flows of $85 million in year 1, $65 million in year 2, and $45 million in year 3. Project B costs $200 million and has cash flows of $120 million in year 1, $100 million in year 2, and $80 million in year 3. What is project A's IRR if the WACC is 10%? 18.80% 20.59% 21.70% 25.72% 32.85%

QUESTION 9 Your division is considering two projects with the following cash flows. Project A costs $225 million and has cash flows of $130 million in year 1, $100 million in year 2, and $75 million in year 3. Project B costs $160 million and has cash flows of $95 million in year 1, $75 million in year 2, and $60 million in year 3. By how much would Project B's internal rate of return (IRR) change if the WACC increased from 5% to 15%? IRR would decrease by 0.34 percentage points IRR would decrease by 1.62 percentage points IRR would decrease by 1.99 percentage points IRR would decrease by 3.42 percentage points IRR would not change

QUESTION 10 Project X has a net present value (NPV) of $45.72 thousand and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 21.95% while Project Y has a net present value (NPV) of $36.19 thousand and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 28.35%. If these projects are independent and the company's WACC is 10%, what should the company do? Take neither of the projects Take only Project X because it has the higher NPV Take only Project Y because it has the higher IRR Take both of the projects because their NPVs are positive and their IRRs exceed the WACC

QUESTION 11 Project X has a net present value (NPV) of $48.52 thousand and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 30.85% while Project Y has a net present value (NPV) of $72.19 thousand and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 25.69%. If these projects are mutually exclusive and the company's WACC is 7%, what should the company do? Take neither of the projects Take only Project X because it has the higher IRR Take only Project Y because it has the higher NPV Take both of the projects because their NPVs are positive and their IRRs exceed the WACC

QUESTION 12 Project Marmot has an upfront cost of $50,000 and will generate cash flows of $16,000 per year for the next 5 years. What is the project's net present value (NPV) if the WACC is 10%? $5,228.54 $7,099.57 $9,057.06 $10,652.59 $14,071.64

QUESTION 13 Project Marmalade has an upfront cost of $70,000 and will generate cash flows of $23,000 per year for the next 5 years. What is the project's internal rate of return (IRR)? 17.57% 18.03% 19.21% 21.57% 25.41%

QUESTION 14 Project Marmot has an upfront cost of $50,000 and will generate cash flows of $16,000 per year for the next 5 years. What is the project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR) if the WACC is 10%? 14.33% 15.92% 16.12% 17.24% 18.96%

QUESTION 15 Project Marmalade has an upfront cost of $70,000 and will generate cash flows of $23,000 per year for the next 5 years. What is the project's payback period? 2.67 years 3.04 years 3.16 years 3.50 years 3.93 years

QUESTION 16 Project Marmalade has an upfront cost of $70,000 and will generate cash flows of $23,000 per year for the next 5 years. What is the project's discounted payback period if the WACC is 15%? 3.42 years 3.93 years 4.09 years 4.38 years 4.47 years

QUESTION 17 Project Nemo has an upfront cost of $100,000 and will generate cash flows of $30,000 per year for the next 5 years. What is the project's payback period? 2.86 years 3.13 years 3.24 years 3.33 years 3.93 years

QUESTION 18 Consider a plan to build a plant that will cost $200 million and generate cash flows of $65 million per year for the next 5 years. If the WACC is 16%, what is the net present value (NPV) of the plant project? $7.48 million $9.65 million $10.51 million $12.83 million $13.96 million

QUESTION 19 Consider a plan to build a plant that will cost $285 million and generate cash flows of $85 million per year for the next 5 years. If the WACC is 12%, the net present value (NPV) of the plant project would be $21.41 million. However, the plant causes pollution and environmental damages that could be mitigated by spending $56 million upfront. This would cause the plant to generate cash flows each year of $93 million rather than $85 million. If the pollution and environmental damages created by the plant do not exceed legal limits, what can we conclude about the plant project? Although the net present value with mitigation is still positive, the plant operators will choose not to mitigate because the net present value is higher without mitigation. The net present value with mitigation is still positive so the plant will choose to mitigate the damages. The net present value with mitigation would be negative so the plant will not open. Even though the net present value with mitigation will be negative, the plant will open and will choose to mitigate the damages. The net present value with mitigation will be negative but the plant will still open and choose to pollute and damage the environment within the limits of the law.

QUESTION 20 Consider a plan to build a plant that will cost $285 million and generate cash flows of $85 million per year for the next 5 years. If the WACC is 10%, the net present value (NPV) of the plant project would be $37.22 million. However, the plant causes pollution and environmental damages that could be mitigated by spending $56 million upfront. This would cause the plant to generate cash flows each year of $93 million rather than $85 million and result in a net present value (NPV) of $11.54 million. However, the annual public health costs to the community will increase by $8 million per year if the plant is built without mitigation. If those externalities are factored in the NPV of the plant with mitigation becomes $41.87 million. If the pollution and environmental damages created by the plant do not exceed legal limits, what can we conclude about the plant project in a pure capitalist system? The plant will open and choose to mitigate the damages because the NPV is still positive. The plant will open and choose not to mitigate the damages because this leads to the highest NPV for the owners. From an economic and societal point of view, there is a deadweight loss of $4.65 million. Both a. and c. are correct. Both b. and c. are correct.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Fundamentals Of Investing

Authors: Scott B. Smart, Lawrence J. Gitman, Michael D. Joehnk

14th Edition

0135175216, 978-0135175217

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

If you were Akio, what would you do now?

Answered: 1 week ago