Provide a critical analysis of Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41. In particular, discuss what the case reveals to you about the value of tort law, to individuals and to society.

• The main facts.
• The issue(s) for consideration.
• The majority ruling and reasoning - do you agree or not? Why or why not?
• The minority judgment(s) - do you agree with these? If so, why?
• The role of policy in tort law - what policies were apparent in the judgments? How appropriate are they in the application of the law?
• Where the case fits within tort law, and how it balances and protects the interests of individuals, and society.

pls make it coursework assessment style and try to use uk case laws where applicable