Provide an interpretation based on the outputs provided.
Question: Does whether or not people are married influence their overall attitude toward prostitution?
Data set description document is provided.
. : . Valid Percent 1.93 3.47 11.58 13.90 24.32 18.53 10.04 7.34 2.70 6.18 100.0 Cum Percent 1.93 5.41 16.99 30.89 55.21 73.75 83.78 91.12 93.82 100.00 Support for Legalization : Value Label Value Frequency Percent 1.00 5 1.93 2.00 9 3.47 3.00 30 11.58 : 4.00 36 13.90 : 5.00 63 24.32 6.00 48 18.53 7.00 26 : 10.04 8.00 19 7.34 : 9.00 7 2.70 : 10.00 16 6.18 : Total 259 100.0 : Support for Legalization : N Valid 259 : Missing 0 Mean 5.47 Mode 5.00 : Std Dev 2.06 : Variance 4.24 : Minimum 1.00 : Maximum 10.00 Percentiles 50 (Median) 5.00 T-TEST T-TEST /TESTVAL=5.5 /VARIABLES= legal /MISSINGEANALYSIS /CRITERIA=CI(0.95). One-Sample Statistics N 259 Mean 5.47 Std. Deviation 2.06 S.E. Mean .13 Support for Legalization One-Sample Test Test Value = 5.500000 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Lower Upper .821 -.03 -.28 .22 t -.23 df 258 Support for Legalization warning: Data is not valid as format E. Field contents are not numeric Clients of Prostitution Client intervention programs in three Ontario cities provided an unprecedented opportunity to gather information from the previously inaccessible population of men arrested for trying to hire street prostitutes. For this study, a detailed anonymous questionnaire was administered to 259 men before the beginning of every client intervention workshop. The variables in the datasets are as follows: 1. Case Identification Number 2. Respondent's Race 3. Respondent's Age 4. Respondent's Annual Salary 5. Respondent's Marital Status Respondents were asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with three statements. Their answers ranged from 1 (Disagree Strongly) to 4 (Agree Strongly). 6. Prefer prostitution to relationship 7. Like to have variety of partners 8. Like control during sex Respondents answered the following statements yes or no: 9. Prostitution doesn't harm anyone? 10. Prostitution is not wrong? Finally, respondents were asked about their level of support for the legalization or decriminalization of prostitution (on a scale of 1 to 10). Note: The dataset contains variable labels and value labels. T-TEST /VARIABLES= Attitude /GROUPS=married(1,0) CRITERIA=CI(0.95). /MISSING=ANALYSIS Group Statistics Overall attitudes towards prostitution index Current Married? Yes No N 120 139 Mean 6.52 7.30 Std. Deviation S.E. Mean 2.15 .20 2.39 .20 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper F Sig. t df Sig. (2- tailed) .006 Mean Difference -.79 Std. Error Difference Equal variances assumed 1.53 .217 -2.76 257.00 .28 -1.35 Overall attitudes towards prostitution index -.23 -2.78 256.57 .006 -.79 .28 -1.34 -.23 Equal variances not assumed . : . Valid Percent 1.93 3.47 11.58 13.90 24.32 18.53 10.04 7.34 2.70 6.18 100.0 Cum Percent 1.93 5.41 16.99 30.89 55.21 73.75 83.78 91.12 93.82 100.00 Support for Legalization : Value Label Value Frequency Percent 1.00 5 1.93 2.00 9 3.47 3.00 30 11.58 : 4.00 36 13.90 : 5.00 63 24.32 6.00 48 18.53 7.00 26 : 10.04 8.00 19 7.34 : 9.00 7 2.70 : 10.00 16 6.18 : Total 259 100.0 : Support for Legalization : N Valid 259 : Missing 0 Mean 5.47 Mode 5.00 : Std Dev 2.06 : Variance 4.24 : Minimum 1.00 : Maximum 10.00 Percentiles 50 (Median) 5.00 T-TEST T-TEST /TESTVAL=5.5 /VARIABLES= legal /MISSINGEANALYSIS /CRITERIA=CI(0.95). One-Sample Statistics N 259 Mean 5.47 Std. Deviation 2.06 S.E. Mean .13 Support for Legalization One-Sample Test Test Value = 5.500000 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Lower Upper .821 -.03 -.28 .22 t -.23 df 258 Support for Legalization warning: Data is not valid as format E. Field contents are not numeric Clients of Prostitution Client intervention programs in three Ontario cities provided an unprecedented opportunity to gather information from the previously inaccessible population of men arrested for trying to hire street prostitutes. For this study, a detailed anonymous questionnaire was administered to 259 men before the beginning of every client intervention workshop. The variables in the datasets are as follows: 1. Case Identification Number 2. Respondent's Race 3. Respondent's Age 4. Respondent's Annual Salary 5. Respondent's Marital Status Respondents were asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with three statements. Their answers ranged from 1 (Disagree Strongly) to 4 (Agree Strongly). 6. Prefer prostitution to relationship 7. Like to have variety of partners 8. Like control during sex Respondents answered the following statements yes or no: 9. Prostitution doesn't harm anyone? 10. Prostitution is not wrong? Finally, respondents were asked about their level of support for the legalization or decriminalization of prostitution (on a scale of 1 to 10). Note: The dataset contains variable labels and value labels. T-TEST /VARIABLES= Attitude /GROUPS=married(1,0) CRITERIA=CI(0.95). /MISSING=ANALYSIS Group Statistics Overall attitudes towards prostitution index Current Married? Yes No N 120 139 Mean 6.52 7.30 Std. Deviation S.E. Mean 2.15 .20 2.39 .20 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper F Sig. t df Sig. (2- tailed) .006 Mean Difference -.79 Std. Error Difference Equal variances assumed 1.53 .217 -2.76 257.00 .28 -1.35 Overall attitudes towards prostitution index -.23 -2.78 256.57 .006 -.79 .28 -1.34 -.23 Equal variances not assumed
